A little interpretation of an adequate act A week away from the end of 30 days, Osman warns actions

The VV as the party that came first in the early elections nominated the candidate for the first of the Parliament, Albulen Hadziun.

From the start, that name was met with fierce opposition. These voices, asked the VV to change the candidate, and providing the green framework for the other candidates. However, although the parties known as the opposition were clear, the VV insisted on Haxhiu to continue insisting until today.

Because of the failure to secure votes for Haxhiu, Kurti's VV put the proposal in practice, but also in practice the secret vote commission. Even this was rejected as Haxhi's name proposal. But this latest proposal only deepened the differences in attitudes.

What happened after that?

The former opposition parties were only vocally opposed to the commission issue. They, in co-operation led by the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo, addressed the Constitutional Court for Explaining the commission.

The report was drafted by AAK experts and requested that this issue be addressed with priority. We consider it a legal offense. The Assembly is also being depreciated, and we consider the Constitution being violated. I prayed to the performers to address him as a priority, perhaps at a temporary rate to prevent him from holding sessions until the Court handles this subject and takes over a” decision, deputy Kadriy said before the media in the case of handover of the subject to the Constitutional.

By the 12th of May when the subject was delivered, it took more than a month for the court to return. And they did it on June 26th.

In an act of some comments, the Constitution for contrasting what was expected again left room for interpretation. The VV continued to promote its position that the commission was allowed, while other parties said the Constitutional stated clearly that the VV's proposal for the secret vote was a violation, and the same one was prevented.

However, the Constitution said something else about which there was no interpretation, but only reconciliation. It was the declaration that the Assembly should be formed within 30 days, meaning, by July 26th.

New Subjects

After the indictment was issued, and the differences in attitudes of são, as the VV through the chairman of the Avni Dehari session continued with the commission for secret voting, the former opposition again addressed the Court.

First was the Democratic Party of Kosovo, one that addressed the Constitution a few days after the latter's conviction.

The first of this party, Memli Krasniqi, said there had been three violations in three sessions.

There have been three violations in three successive sessions, contrary to the Constitutional Act, today, during the day The PDK will hand over to the Constitution a new case, which we hope to deal with with the necessary urgency, since we already have only 23 days at the end of the Constitutional Term”, Krasniqi said.

The PDK was asked to assess the constitutionality of actions as; Requesting secret voting commission members' proposals; Vote this Commission; Commission vote itself; The arbitrary suspension of the session after the Commission's disapproval.

After the PDK, the Democratic League of Kosovo also addressed the Constitutional.

From this party, the court was asked to clarify the constitutional norms and regulations of the Parliament regarding the continuation of the session, following an act of judgment by the court. This party is believed to have established the latest continuation of the constitutional session “in full opposition”.

MP Rock Manaj had declared that the chairman of the constitutional session should conduct the session in line with the agenda.

“There is no political will that can change the constitutional session agenda because this is determined with the rule of work of the Parliament, and the Constitutional Court has estimated that this act is subject to the assessment of constitutionality”, Manaj said.

Both of these subjects handed over after the indictment are still awaiting constitutional comments, writes Express, broadcasting Periscope.

Warnings of New Requests

Besides the above - mentioned subjects, there have been warnings about new subjects to be handed over to the Court.

It was the country's president, Vjosa Osmani, who has warned such a thing. The latter in an earlier comment had warned legal consequences if the Assembly is not constitutionalised within 30 days, but should be clarified as to what they are.

What I've mentioned is that when something is constitutionally mandatory, it means that failure to comply will have legal consequences. It's not that we can expect that the Court will say: well, after 30 days go on the same way. I don't expect that. I plan, if there's no arrangement of the Assembly soon, to address the Court at the request for clarification, about what in 30 days. Because I want to explain what is the legal consequence of not carrying out the constitutional obligation of the constitution within 30 days”, she said.

While in a recent comment, given these days, she has made it known that the subject for the Constitution is being prepared, and that the same will be sent to the beginning of next week unless the assembly is constitutionalised.

We are preparing the subject for the Constitutional, and if there are no institutions in the weekend, at the beginning of the week we will send it to the Constitutional for clarifications but we cannot prejudge how long it may take to judge and that we can get into a crisis we haven't been in before”, she said during a conference.

The new subject was also warned by the VV. More precisely, it was Haxhiu who has warned a subject to the Supreme Court, since it has said the issue of illegal acts or administrative directives from ministers who are MPs is illegal and violates constitutional provisions, prompting fierce opposition from the government in office.

Which page does the Supreme decision that we should release. I haven't been declared for this, but for me it's been an amazing act of judgment, but since you're asking me it's been an amazing act because it's first overstepping its powers, it's entered into Constitutional competencies, we're going to complain about the Supreme Court's decision because we have the right to submit to the Constitutional Court, so it's going to remain the Constitutional Court to make the assessment of this”, she has declared.

Otherwise, more open to resolution of the crisis, and closer to each other were LVV and NISMA. Even leaders of these two parties today have held another meeting where the unblocking of the situation has been discussed.

However, even this meeting does not seem to have had an agreement. As long as we remember that Fatmir Limaj, leader of NISMA demands the position of parliament's party, but that such a thing, Kurti S' has been willing to accept.

Continued session will take place tomorrow, while the end of the 30-day deadline is next Saturday. Whether there may be institutions creation, or even the legal consequences of not forming them, it should only be expected, given the policy of interpretation. /Periscope/