The incumbent Deputy Prime Minister for Whom the Supreme is the Constitutional Constitutional Constitution

Deputy Prime Minister in office Besnik Beslim had to take place a Supreme Court decision to become alive in opinion. Bislimi, for which the Constitutional Court is corrupted, non-inflicitable and without credibility”, says the Supreme state that it's possible to practiceism and find a lot of shame. The Supreme Court and the decision [...]
Deputy Prime Minister in office Besnik Beslim had to take place a Supreme Court decision to become alive in opinion.
Bislimi, for which the Constitutional Court is corrupted, non-inflicitable and without credibility”, says the Supreme state that it's possible to practiceism and find a lot of shame.
The Supreme Court and the ruling that Iron Murati committed constitutional and legal violations by exercising two-poweredness, Bislim called <x0-pirative”.
A case both typical and primitive of the open war that the judiciary has declared to the government and the development of the state. A war I will surely lose with a lot of shame”, Besnik Bislim wrote in his private Facebook profile.
In rough language, Bislim had also been addressed to the Constitutional Court, which he had described as: A corrupt environment, powerless and free of credibility.
Our Constitutional Court is known in the production of documents/controversial decisions; and we see this on daily grounds because we believe they lack competence and credibility. And that's the only constitutional decision that can't be implemented”, Besnik Bislim said.
So whenever the Government believes they are serving justice, it's hard to act in accordance with these decisions. It's hard to act on them.”
But if my promise to citizens is to give them justice when we know that the Constitutional Court's decision is the product of a corrupt environment, the least I can do is say that this decision, in my opinion, is not the product of a loan institution”, Bislimi has continued./Periscopi/
Over 60 illegal decisions: Like Kurt and his ministers overstepped the Constitution?












