Candidates claim there were technical errors in the medical examination, UP expected to investigate them

The investigation by this commission comes after several candidates for medical students said they have also complained in the UP's reactors that there were technical errors in receiving exam questions.

Three candidates interviewed by KA LLXO.com They declare technical errors in the admission exam where they are tested, while complaining to the Ankes Commission at the Faculty of Medicine and say their complaints have been deemed groundless.

The hearing of the Faculty of Medicine has 25 questions in Kim and Biology classes, and this year there have been five aspects of the study: General Medicine, Stomatology, Pharmac, Infermier and Phaziorapy.

According to the final list of results, Ermira Bytyqi has received 72.58 points at the Faculty of Medicine for 0.78 points.

I've been going to the course for two years intensively, I've been preparing for the last two to three months, and I'm insulated to learn all that I can do on the receiving exam, but we've got something that we haven't learned in the books. KALLXO.com, in 17.07.2025, broadcasts Periscope.

Bytyqi has shown that in the fourth question of the chemistry test in Stomatology, where a chemical reaction has been given, and then the standard enthropia of the compounding is asked, the chloride of iron is not compatible with what they have learned about this task.

We in our books and the courses that we've been following to prepare, we've learned that the coincidences in a reaction don't apply to the apple endopin of formation... We measure, we've filed a complaint about this question that it didn't suit us anywhere, nor did scientific studies that they are, nor has it been shown by Bytych.

The candidate for Stomatology also claimed that the Faculty of Medicine Ankes Commission and the Chemistry Commission have behaved very badly with complainers when they submitted to the Fakulet for their complaint.

“They have also attacked us blindly, the members of the Commission and those who have given us explanations of these questions. They got us out of here, you know, right now, we haven't been given any explanation for what we asked for. They haven't spoken to us in any way.

Two years of pause is too big. I don't know, I have to look for other opportunities outside the country because the country is offering us something of quality. ”

Pirro Zejnou Allahi on the general medicine hearing exam has 78.14 points and has not been admitted for 1.6 points.

Zejnullah has identified two technical errors, one in the Kimia test and one in the Biology of the recipient's exam at General Medicine.

According to Zeynep, in the sixth question of Kimmy's test, where it was asked that “sa is pH (the value of hydrogen ions concentration) of digestive ions, which in 500 cm3 contains 3,1018 hydroxy ions”, is wrong after 3.

“With this given number, none of the options are correct. When we were complaining, they said that they themselves said it was a technical error and you were supposed to be thinking that it's time [plots]. We can't imagine if this is the exact science of chemistry, i.m. As it says, it should be taken.

Zejnoullah also mentioned that he had reported the supervisor during his trial, but replied according to him that “does not know” if it was marked wrong.

He has contested the key or the correct answer to the 25th question of the Biology test in which the agreement on lizomies (organial) has been requested.

“According to the key, the correct answer was the option below a; I have it under c, as I learned” he said.

For this question, the Biology Commission has provided answers that they have asked for to be published in full. You find their full answer at the end of the news.

The Biology School of Medicine's interrogation commission is composed of: Kemal Bislimi, Elez Krasniqi and Mentor Soopyan.

However, on the basis of their response to the question posed by Zeinsu, they have received what they say is learned in high school in the books of the 10th grade biology year.

This Commission has shown that there have been a total of 10 complaints and that they have been brought with correctness and respect to each complainer.

Eronita Qamili also in the General Medicine has reached 79.08 points, but has not been admitted to the Fakulet for 0.66 points.

Qamili has reiterated the claim that the Chemistry Commission had arrogant behavior.

They're extremely misbehaved, for example, not logos you should know, that's the most basic thing. You can't start without math.

Qamili has identified the question 25 in Kimis General Medicine test Group B, in which he claims that no option for electronic configuration for Asttat (technical elements) has been correct, since the x14 orbit is marked.

It is based on the chemistry book to ascertain that there may be, not 14 electrons in orbit.

I'm still on the medical course, I'm demanding that justice and transparency be restored to the test.

In terms of candidate claims, KALLXO.com has asked them from the 1707,2025, but the Kimis Commission and the Ankes have not provided answers to the publication of the news.

The commission to draw up the questions of the receiving exam of the Faculty of Medicine of Kimia is made up of: Arben Haziri, Makphire Sadiku and Hami Ismaili.

And the Ankes Commission of the Faculty of Medicine consists of: Vlora Ismaili-jaha, Premim Rasiti and Xhevdet Krasniqi.

At 11.07.2025, KALLXO.com has monitored the quarantine of professors who spent 18 hours preparing the receiving exam. During this isolation, they have had time to check their exams if they have technical errors.

Full answers to the Biology Commission:

In all three classroom biology texts 10 (principle 2005, 2012 and 2014 (contained editions of the books) by not deepening in detail, writes that lizos are organs of animal and plant cells wrapped in one-sided membranes. This is taken as a correct response to the test.

According to modern university literature (how: Alberts, Lodish, Campbell, etc.), is highlighted and then explained in detail that typical lizos are present in animal cells, while in plant cells there are no unique espossions in animal cells, but the egg (merstematic cells) or the liqueturous vaquilla (referenced plant cells) with many functions similar to animal cells. Such books are university books with many details, beyond advance knowledge of high school students who don't even learn from these university books or at that level. These university books are international publications in English.

It is even the subject of debate among botanistic scientists (far beyond the level of high school students), whether these plant cell structures call lizosomes or not (e.g. look at the plant cell picture from the Encyclopædia Britannica (https://www.britannica.com/science/planet-cell) that introduce lizos within the plant cell. Plant cells, for the needs of their vital activity, must perform many cell processes, including autophagia.

After all, it would be unfair for students (and beyond the commission's competencies) to make the student's questions based on modern university literature (such as: Alberts, Lodish, Campbell, etc., from which students do not learn, not from the high school biology texts from which students have learned.

From our experience as a commission, we can be sure that even complainers about the A25 question have not learned in high school from modern university books, but they try to use tai as an alibi for their failures. After all, out of about 1800 applicants, only about 10 of them had complaints, and they had groundless complaints, either in this or in some other issue of biology.

Hopefully, that answer is enough to give proper clarification. As proof of the record, you also have several relevant pages of the 10th grade biology books (print 2005, 2012 and 2014) attached.

2. The commission that was dealt with by Biology has been composed of three university professors. This commission has worked on the basis of its competencies and responsibility. The biology commission has always been brought with correctness and respect to each of the 10 complainers. Most complaining students have also had adequate access, exempting someone who at any cost insists on despite clarifications and documentations (represented books) provided by the commission. Such students are even presented to the commission by weeping and by poor manners and humility. /Periscope/