Banning officials, former municipal officials in Gjakova who were arrested for misuse of official office

According to point 1 of the prosecution's request device, among other things it claims there is a suspicion based that defendants A.B. and E.B.

During 2018, defendant A.B., in the quality of the official person Director of the Directorate for Urbanism and Environmental Protection in the municipality of Gjakova, and defendant E. B., in the quality of the official Leadership of the Urban Sector in this directorial Office, deliberately and in interaction with each other, using official duty and in order to bring wealth itself to each other, have exceeded their official competencies by acting in opposition to public interest, so that on the 10,10,2018, they have issued and signed consent in the interest of the A.L., for the partial physical parcel of the parcels.... socially owned public road, no... owned by the Communist Framework in the Bloodov and No. owned by B. I. in the Gjakova (V.) even though defendants have been aware of the legal owners of these irresponsibles because in their file, property certificates of the date 24.09.2018, and from this action the A.L. side, it manages to create new parcels and the same ones it carries in its name, with cases of their actions affecting and damaging the Convention Council rich in Gjakova, as well as the C.B., I, the Gjakov, in the report.

With these actions, the suspicion is given that, in co-ordination, they have carried out the criminal work Misuse of official position or authority by Article 422 par.1 concerning KPRK's Article 31.

According to point II of the prosecutor's application device, among other things, it is suggested that there is the suspicion based on the fact that during 2019 the defendant A.B., in the quality of the official person director of the Directorate for Urbanism and Environmental Protection in the Gjakova municipality, as well as the defendant E.B., in the quality of the official leader of the Urbanic Sector in this directorate, deliberately and in interaction with each other, using the official duty of self-profit or benefit, have gone beyond their official competence by acting in public opposition to the interest that has signed on the 26th of the parties, ML and the commoners's interest.... owned by B. I., in the Gjakova (V….) even though defendants have been aware of the legal owner of this incompatibility because in the content file they have had the property certificate date 01.10,2019, and by this action the M.L., and the U.S., they manage to carry their property to the surface of 599 m2 and the number... on the surface of 115 m2, with their actions violated and damaged the property of C.B. I. in Gjakova.

With these actions, the suspicion is made that, in co-ordination, they have carried out the criminal work Misuse of official position or authority by Article 1414 par.1 concerning KPRK's Article 31.

According to point III of the prosecution's request device, the defendant A.L. and A.K. are also suggested to be suspicious based on suspicion.

During 2019 the defendant A.L., in the quality of the official person at the Directorate for Cadaster, Geodezee and Property in the Gjakova municipality, as well as defendant A.K., in the quality of the jury, deliberately and in interaction with each other, using the official task of bringing wealth to themselves or another, have exceeded their official powers by acting in opposition to public interest and with Article 13 and 14 of the Law.04 L-013 for Kadaster and versus Article 4 of Law No.04/ L-009 on the changes and completion of Law No.2002/5 on the establishment of the real estate Rights Register, so that even though defendants have been aware of the legal owners of these incompatibilities as they had property certificates in the file, on the 1501.2019 basis, and signed the decision to approve of the new cadastral parcels formed after measuring the request of the A.L., and that from the parcel... on the surface of 5996 m2 which has remained owned by the PSH and the No.... on the surface of 14 feet [12 m] that is owned by the A side. L., of the No... parcel owned by B. I., in the Gjakova (V…), new parcels have been created... on the surface of 168 m2 that has been transported to the A.L. side, and number..., on the surface of 3618 m2, which has remained owned by the V... on the surface of 280 m2 that is owned by the A.L. side, and no. ...... on the surface of 5406 m2 that has remained owned by the Municipal Assembly in Gjakova, with cases of their actions being violated and damaged by the Communist Assembly's rich in E Gjakova, as well as the K. B. I. in Gjakova says further.

With these actions, the suspicion is given that, in co-ordination, they have carried out the criminal work Misuse of official position or authority by Article 422 par.1 concerning KPRK's Article 31.

According to the IV point of the prosecution's application device, among other things, it is suggested that there is a suspicion based on the fact that during 2019 the defendant A.L., we the quality of the official person at the Directorate for Cassaster, Geodesy, and Property in the Gjakova municipality, as well as the defendant A.K., in the quality of the jury, deliberately and in interaction with each other, using the official duty of its own or other to benefit rich, have surpassed their powers by acting in public opposition to interest and 14/04. L-013 for Kadaster and versus Article 4 of Law No.04/ L-009 on the changes and completion of Law No.2002/5 on the establishment of the real estate Rights Register, in that even though defendants were aware of the legal owner of this incompatibility because the property certificate was issued on the basis of 12,12.2019, they have issued and signed the decision to submit ownership to the third parties of the U.S. and M.L., as in the area of 599 and the number of targets... I. in Gjakova, (V….), initially carry it in M's name and ownership. L., and then on behalf of the U.S., and his family at 1/4, with their actions scathing and damaging the rich B. I., in Gjakova.

With these actions, the suspicion is made that, in co-ordination, they have carried out the criminal work Misuse of official position or authority by Article 1414 par.1 concerning KPRK's Article 31.