9 hours agoAvni Dehari with the interpretation of the Constitutional Act prompted reactions of the LDK's PDK.
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Vetevendosje Movement MP Avni Dehari, in a Facebook text, has said it would be a violation if MPs asked whether they were for a secret vote to elect the prime minister or not. Dehari, the leader now of more than 40 Parliament continuation in trying to forge the ninth legislature. [...]
Dehari, the leader now of more than 40 Parliament continuation in trying to forge the ninth legislature.
He has said that in the Constitutional Act of June 26th, for the constitutional session, it is not determined whether the way of voting should be open or secret and that procedure motions are not valid either.
“Picka 178 of the Act says neither the Constitution nor the rule of the Assembly determines whether the manner of voting at the constitutional session should be open or secret, and that also for the constitutional hearing, procedure motions are not valid. The 57th Article of the Parliament Rule is not for the constitutional session, but only for plenary sessions and only under certain circumstances, which are expressly referred to in the Order. The Constitutional Court has confirmed that no procedure motion is valid at the constitutional hearing. Consequently, it would be a violation if MPs were asked whether you were for a secret vote or not, he wrote.
Dehari further wrote he proposed the secret vote in the spirit of the 2014 Constitutional Act. “Vota for, against or abstained for the commission for the secret vote means expressing the will of MPs for the way they vote. Of course, one way of voting has no more value or weight than another. The rejection of MPs to vote the commission is the refusal to carry out the secret vote -- that is, refusing to realise a right -- that guarantees the Constitutional Court Act”, he added.
Following that position of Dehar, there have been reactions from other parties.
Kosovo's Democratic Party of Gruda's progress has said that in this writing, Dehari has acknowledged that no procedure motions are allowed, but that he has not had the courage to read the case to the end.
“Paragraph 187 of the court clearly states: én IV's development and completion of the Constituve Seanca should be guided in accordance with the constitutional definitions of the constitution, Head IV (Constitution of the Parliament) of the Parliamentary Order and the untily parliamentary practices of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo Assembly. What has been that until now parliamentary practice? Open vote. Always. Therefore, Avni Dehari has no right to vote for the Commission for Secret Vote, because this directly violates this paragraph of the court's act of”, has written Gruda in Facebook.
And Besian Mustafa of the Democratic League has said that Dehar's writing translates Vetevendosje's mind.
“It would be a constitutional offense if MPs were asked whether you were for a secret vote or not Dehar said. While his decision, without asking anyone, to change the way they vote, is constitutional. So, according to him, deputies are gonna ask me, they just have to lower their heads and vote. That is their understanding: Shut up, vote to tell us, don't you ask for anything”, wrote Mustafa in Facebook.
The motion issue was raised the day before, when Alliance for the Future of Kosovo MP Beke Berisha said one must be raised to end the issue of stalemate. He said he has reflected and that in the open vote he will vote for any candidate proposing by Vetevendosje.
We remember that the Constitutional Court decided to impose on MPs to hold the Parliament for 30 days.
Despite the Constitutional decision, Dehari has continued with the secret vote proposal.
And it was sent to the Constitution again by the Democratic Party and the Democratic League. /Periscopi/
