Actakuze against three people and a company in Suhareka damaged the municipality's budget for over 13 thousand euros

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren has announced he has filed an indictment against B.K. E.S. under the suspicion that in co-ordination they committed criminal work “and legal person “S. Sh.P.K. For “ “Foundation Procurory in Prizren, the Randa Crime Department, has established [...]
“Foundation Procurory in Prizren, the Department of Criminals, has filed charges against the defendants B.K., and E.S., due to well-founded suspicions that the same in co-ordination committed the criminal work “The use of official position or authority” by Article 414, par.2 related to the 31 KPRK, and against the D.S.S., and the legal person <4S>. C.O” Sh.P.K., due to well-based suspicion of having committed criminal work “Kestum use and public procurement fraud” by Article 415 par.3 related to par.2 of the Republic of Kosovo Penal Code (KPRK). ”
According to the indictment “from 13,07.2022 to 12.12.22 in Suhareka, in co-ordination, acting on the quality of the official persons and him, defendant B.K., Senior Project Management Officer in the Suhareka Town, appointed as Procuration Project Manager with the title of local road construction Lot 8-lot5 November two, Jajel Morina, Mehmet Bytyqi segment at Reshtanı, and defendant E.S., appointed as Direct Supervisor of the contract Manager on the same project, exploiting office and official authority in order to benefit from whatever benefits for themselves or the other person, deliberately exceed their legally defined competencies and act in opposition to the Law for Public Procurement and Public Procuration, where evidence ensures that the money of 24.45 euros is paid for by an economic operator, as it was laid down in real terms of the contract. The defendants, including planned material, length and breadth of roads, and precisely the real value of the work done is less than the value of the previous works in this contract, even though there have been changes between the amount of contract and that accomplished by including the planned materials, length and length of roads, and the exact real value of the work done, which is less than the value of the previous works in this contract and in the pre-conventional work, where, in general, the value of the work accomplished is 13,276 euro, less than the previous value of the contract, which is more recent work, with the November 22,222206th).
These actions in the quality of co-chairees have committed criminal work “
However, the defendant D.S., as a responsible person in the legal person from 13,07.22 to 12,12.2022 in Suhareka and in the village of Reshtan, acting in quality of the co-owner and as authorized representative director of the company “S.C.O.” S. P.K, and defendant judicial person “S. C.O” Sh.P.K., deliberately violate public procurement procedures and regulations and fail to comply with obligations stemming from the public procurement contract with the aim of profiting for themselves, causing budget damage to the Suhareka Community.
“The defendant D.S., in interaction with the official members of the Suhareka municipality, and right with the contract manager B.C., compiles the document, the extinguishing situation as well as the extinguishing reports of performing jobs through his company, so the defendant D.S., with the date of 1508.2022, issues number 16 which were handed over to the Suharca municipality with the date of 13,09.2022, worth 15,000 euros, and the account number of the 35.20220, with the date of Suharca, with a 20-2021 year worth of real-time work, with the officials having been carrying out the contracting out of the contract, as the country's high-proportional construction process, which has been submitted to the contract, while the country's due to the country's due to have been confirmed construction. The defendant's actions have benefited illegal property by causing material damage to the Suhareka municipality worth 13,272.66 euros. ”
With these same actions, “Kestum use and public procurement fraud”
The prosecutor of the case in the case of the establishment of the indictment has proposed to the court that after maintaining judicial review, management of their evidence and assessment, the high-ranking defendants for criminal acts they are accused of guilty and be punished by the law. /Periscope/












