7 hours ago<x0 macked bisly after interview: Criticise Prosecution and Attack Media
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)The incumbent Deputy Prime Minister, Besnik Bislimi, has reacted after interviewing as a witness by the Kosovo Special Prosecutor over the investigation into the factory's lease for processing animal by the Ministry of Agriculture, Periscope reports. Bislem through a report on his Facebook account, criticised the prosecutor for the questions they posed during the interview [...]
Bislem through an interview on his Facebook account, criticised the prosecution for the questions they posed during the interview and attacked the media.
“Nated by the fact that the entrance to the interview building was flooded by portals, which no longer occurs when witnesses are invited, and from the experience of getting the news into the media about exactly when the three-way dialogue meeting in Brussels was under way, comes to an inevitable conclusion that the primary purpose of this interview has been to produce news media, where government displays become part of titles along with the term <x1-scandal”. “Scandal” that originated is neither in the ministry of the line nor in the prosecutor's, but in media exhibits. This puts the prosecution in an extremely negative perspective in the face of responsibilities and orientation he has chosen to pursue”, Bislim wrote among other things.
Full Posting:
Today I was at the procurement site in the quality of the witness in the prosecution's investigation into the functioning of the plant for animal byproducts in Drenas. The interview lasted about an hour and 30 minutes, and during that time there were no questions that could be described as questions to a witness. I also came to confirm that all the information I presented today can be collected very easily without the need for an interview at all. It would have sufficed a minimal study of the duties and responsibilities of the deputy prime minister within the European integration portfolio and a quick review of reports for the country over the years by the European Commission.
Given the fact that the entry of the interview building was flooded by portals, which no longer occurs when witnesses are invited, and from the experience of getting the news about exactly when the trilatheral meeting of the dialogue was under way in Brussels, comes the inevitable conclusion that the primary purpose of this interview has been to produce news media, where government reports become part of titles along with the term “candal”. “Scandal” that originated is neither in the ministry of the line nor in the prosecutor's, but in the media exhibits. This puts the prosecution in an extremely negative perspective regarding the responsibilities and orientation he has chosen to pursue. It would be of multiple interest for this approach to be revised.
