Recica for the Government's decision on lecho additions: Social Care or Election Calculation

Following the Government's decision on increasing the additions to lehoat has been spoken by former Labour and Social Management Minister Skender Recica, naming support as necessary but delayed and with questionable political motives. Any additional support for citizens, whether for civil servants or for lehons, is welcome,” said Recica. [...]
Following the Government's decision on increasing the additions to lehoat has been spoken by former Labour and Social Management Minister Skender Recica, naming support as necessary but delayed and with questionable political motives.
Any additional support for citizens, whether for civil servants or for lehons, is welcome,” said Recica. He stressed the importance of helping in difficult economic times, adding that “is a time with high cost of living and economic uncertainty, any concrete assistance in the family budget is needed. ” he said.
However, according to him, such measures should not be temporary and linked to election cycles.
“Citizens need responsible and long-term policies, not fragmented measures that apply only when election time is approaching, he stressed.
Recica raised serious questions about the moment the decision was made.
Unfortunately, the decision to raise wages and additions to the lehos, though essentially right, comes at a moment that triggers reasonable doubts: just before announcing the date for local elections, or maybe parliamentary ones, due to the non-compliance of the Parliament,” he said, F.ront Online, broadcast Periscope.
He called for permanent legal arrangement on such matters, especially for civil servants and mothers.
“Pages of civil servants must be increased in line with inflation and guaranteed by law, so that they are not used as an instrument of manipulation in electoral periods,” said Recica, adding that “is urgent to adopt a special and inclusive law for leukemia, which guarantees elementary rights without being influenced by election cycles. ”
He deemed social measures to be unacceptable for political gain.
“Temporary solutions are not enough. Policy needs to be stable, transparent and built on the real needs of citizens, daily and not only on the eve of electoral campaigns, he said, adding that <x2 actions require serious analysis and accountability. The questions are clear and legitimate: Why didn't he act earlier? Why was transparency lacking? And why is it always on the eve of the election? /Periscope












