“sometimes punched in the head” Inflammatory details against police suspected of mistreating a man in Prizren

The hearing in which it is expected to be decided in terms of security measures is held today at the Constitutional Court in Prizren.

In the prosecution's request for the detention measure, provided by “Justice Trust“, there is reported doubt that on 14 June 2025 around 21:35 at 21:35 in Prizren, at a café, suspect Remzi Pulaj as a police official, misusing his authorizations, abused the other person, until he was with another police official during the official exercise of office.

According to the Prosecutor, the injured S.F. have been fined for the illegal parking car they put in the car window, and that's when the injured man who's been inside the coffee shop came out, throwing a fine of injustice on the ground. After that, police official Remzi Pulaj reportedly, along with his colleague, seeing the fine dropped, the injured have given verbal orders to present ID documents, but he has not obeyed their order.

With this, police officials were said to have begun arresting the injured, but he has again refused to arrest him and that during his attempt to arrest him, at one point the injured defendant has put his foot on him, while his colleague and the injured man had fallen to the ground, falling on the injured, and there on the ground and trying to bring him under control, the defendant has sometimes punched him in the head, in the eye, and in the left ear part.

With this, it is allegedly committed criminal work “Kest treatment during the exercise of official duty or public authorization” by Article 195, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.

Always according to the prosecution, by date, time and place as at the first point of this device, the defendant has caused serious body injury to the other person, so that defendant Remzi Pulaj is injured to the S.F., sometimes hit him with fists in the head, eyes and left ear. As a result, the injury has caused serious bodily injury.

With this, it's suspected that he committed the criminal act “The heavy bodily launch” by Article 186, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code.

The prosecution estimates there are legal reasons for appointing the detention measure, since with his release, the defendant may influence his colleague (in his testimony), who is an eyewitness. Also, the fact that the work was carried out by a police official is said to be taken into account.

Similarly, the prosecution estimates that the burden and nature of the criminal act should be taken into account, as well as its -- the condition of the one who is not stable.

According to the prosecution, other alternative measures for ensuring the defendant's presence in criminal procedure are insufficient, so proposes the appointment of the detention measure. /Periscope/