Killed his wife, Court of Appeals confirms the life sentence for Edmond Leic.

The Court of Appeals has confirmed the life sentence for Edmond Lajci.

The same was convicted of killing his wife, Judge Ukalla.

Communications:

Pristina, June 9th 202550th, has rejected the complaint of indictee E.L.'s defender, confirming the Constitutional Court's act in Pec leda . PKR.nr.74/2024, date 03.02.2025.

The Foundation Court in Pec. PKR.r.74/2024, dated 03.02.2025, has convicted the accused of E.L., due to criminal acts of serious murder by Article 173 paragraph 1 points 1.3 of KKP and possession, control or authorised possession of weapons, from Article 366 paragraph 1 of KKP, imposing them with life imprisonment. In the sentence pronounced in prison, it was estimated last time in detention from 16,04,2024, as well as seized the means of carrying out criminal work, model pistol “Zoraki 917-T”, with a serial number..., with a magator and five bullets, which will be destroyed after the act becomes almighty.

The court estimates that the court's first-instance act was not included in the essential violations of the criminal procedure provisions, seen in Article 384 of KPPK, for which college violations of this court, and according to the legal provision of Article 394 of the KPP, as well as estimates that the first degree court has presented clear and complete reasons by providing proper reasons for which evidence is considered to be proved in this criminal case, due to the criminal acts that are imposed on the accused, as well as presenting the accuracy of the evidence from the subjects, such as personal evidence and material.

While the Court of Appeals estimates that the first degree in total and just cases has confirmed the existence of each criminal offense, since it has assessed all evidence, both personal and material, namely, of the prosecution's guiltyness, for the criminal acts that are placed on it, the court of justice estimates that the court of the first instance rightly ruled when it declared it guilty, since there are no circumstances that exclude it from criminal responsibility and prosecution.

Praising all the circumstances described as in this court, the court is convinced that with sentence pronounced to life in prison as in the practice of judicial action, its effect will be achieved, and its intent to prevent perpetrators from committing criminal acts in the future, and to do its rehabilitation, prevent other persons from committing criminal acts, to make compensation to victims or community for losses or damages caused by criminal acts, and to express social judgment for criminal work, raise morality and strengthen the obligation to observe the law before the first of the 38KP.