Financial report published by the CEC PDK)

The Central Election Commission (KQZ) has published audited financial reports of political parties for the year 2024. The report has stressed that the PDK has made accurate disregard for contributions to nature and rent expenditures, Periscopi broadcast. According to the report The PDK has said it has spent 2,900 euros on an object in Gjilan, for [...]
According to the report The PDK has said it has spent 2,900 euros on an facility in Gjilan, which was said ownership is clear.
The report says the PDK has signed that the object is in use from 1999, but there is no support documentation proving the right to use property.
The report stresses that lack of data creates uncertainty about the correctness of the contribution presentation.
The PDK has lacked procurement procedures, stressing that “the political entity has not implemented any formalised tender procedure for purchase and supplies of goods and services”.
Furthermore, the political subject has not created and implemented financial management policies and procedures and control for the procurement process, creating uncertainty in management and documentation of expenditures”, the report says.
The audience has further added that the Democratic Party lacks regular signatures in financial mirrors.
Also, for the use of municipal objects, the report suggests that during 2024, The PDK has used 28 offices until three of them use them for free, which is said to be contrary to the legal stops for contributions in nature.
“During the audit, it has been found that the political subject, during 2024, operated with a network of 28 offices in various municipalities in the Republic of Kosovo, where three of them use municipal objects free of rent. These benefits have not been declared donations in nature, as required with relevant legislation. According to Law No. 03 L-174 for financing of Political Subjects, modified and fulfilling with Law No. 08/L-122, political subjects are prohibited from accepting donations or benefits in nature from public institutions, including municipalities. Acceptance and non-recognition of these benefits constitutes direct violations of legal provisions, violates transparency and increases the risk of unauthorized institutional influence on the activities of political subject”, said further in the report published by the Central Election Commission.
The Auditor's Complete Report THESE
The audience says LDKI financial mirrors lack transparency and control












