What is expected of the leadership meeting, following the ultimatum by the Constitutional Court?

The Constitutional Court yesterday ruled out the act by which it obliged MPs not later than 30 days to complete the Kosovo Parliament's constitutional session and elect the mayor and vice president. However, parliamentary parties do not have the same reading for this act. Vetevendosje movement insists that the secret vote is not unconstitutional, while other parties [...]
The Constitutional Court's ruling created a new moment in the stalemate where the Kosovo Parliament has stalled for months since holding the 9 February elections. In today's session of the constitutional session where the 38th effort would take place, the session was interrupted with the reasoning that parliamentary groups have agreed to continue after that which will produce the meeting at Kurti.
The Constitutional Act said: “Proposal of the candidate for the Parliament's/Worse president is directly related to reaching the majority of votes of all the Parliament deputies, and as such, this right for the candidate's proposal for the Parliament's/KW) candidate makes up the obligation simultaneously to the largest parliamentary group for trust co-operation and constructive consultation with other parliamentary groups to find the consensus or compromise needed<1>.
In reflection, Kurti is taking this responsibility as the task of having the party with the most seats in the Assembly, inviting the meeting.
“As V Movement Chairman I am now addressing all leaders of subjects represented in the ninth legislature, with the invitation for a joint meeting Saturday ( tomorrow) at 4: 00 p.m., in a follow - up attempt on the consensus for converting the Assembly”, Kurti wrote.
At this meeting the parties are going with different readings of the Constitutional Act and with no sign that there will be an approach.
Vetevendosje Deputy Chairman Glauk Konjufca, who went to the conference prior to the launch of the constitutional session, said the Constitutional Court in any proposal the VV s chase has found violations, including the secret vote.
The secret default is not unconstitutional. Please! It's not unconstitutional. Mr. Dehar is not unconstitutional. If you find a paragraph in an experimental way where the court says wrong at this point, Avni Dehari, the procedures should be returned back then okay I give responsibility to”, Conjufca said.
He also insisted on the joint responsibility for the constitution.
Because of our reading, the obligation to complete the decision's conclusion is to all MPs, and not to be the sole responsibility of the one who has emerged first in the election”, said Konjufca a statement that was also said by his party chief.
The next “represents this act for PDK.
MP Progress Gruda said the solution is to return to the open vote, while insisting the hidden vote is unconstitutional.
“The court has declared it unconstitutional and has clearly clarified it. They know they have committed violations until today, as the court has said, and know that insisting on the hidden vote is also constitutional offense. It's very clear, the bias says MPs should vote for, against or abstained in the session. We did it till the time when the matter was not changed. The moment that has changed the agenda, to make it to a hidden vote, we don't have to vote on a decision-making that is unconstitutional. So we don't vote on something that's unconstitutional, he said after the hearing.
From the Democratic League of Kosovo, MP Hykmete Bajrami spoke, who said Kurti and his party are interpreting the Constitutional Act “otherwise from all over Kosovo.
I believe you have the Constitutional Act. We've also seen different proposals from VV's expeditions, which actually plan to continue this stalemate by making an interpretation different from all over Kosovo... The bias is extremely clear when it comes to voting. When it comes to the secret vote, Article 8 clearly states that there are no references to any other article that speaks of changing the agenda, she said.
AAK leader Ramush Haradinaj, just as The LDK's PDK called for a return to the open vote. Moreover, he said that if he changes candidacy, and if he agrees, his party's votes are to help get out of the corner.
As two key finders, Haradinaj said it is the mention of earlier voting practices, and the other is the necessity of co-operation.
The night before the head of PDK) Memli Krasniqi, reacting to the indictment, said that “na is pleased that the Constitutional Court ended this deliberate game of delays by the V coalition V-Guxo-Alternatives, making it clear that they have no right to block the process and that the Assembly should be introduced within 30 days”.
The Constitutional Court gave clarity: the election of the Speaker and Vice Presidents of the Parliament must occur within 30 days. As we noted from the beginning, the constitutional session agenda cannot be changed at will, and no one has the right to impose secret voting without constitutional grounds and without regular procedure” Krasniqi stressed.
LDK chief Lumir Abdixhiku said the essence of the act is open voting
Ten lost sessions, to the imposings that were filed as unconstitutional today. From tomorrow, the LDK expects the largest parliamentary group to act in accordance with this act, interrupt the impasses and contribute to the rapid and regular institution of the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo. Open vote. Consensus and compromise” wrote Obadiah.
Haradinaj stressed that the Constitution has created legal grounds to get out of the created stalemate.
“I take advantage of the opportunity to call on all MPs, regardless of political and party affiliations, to implement this Constitutional Court decision and pave the way for the constitutional institution of the Parliament and the establishment of institutions stemming from the last parliamentary elections”, he said./Periscopi/












