Tahiri: Proposal for sessions once a week is unconstitutional, “execution” for authoritarian transitional governance

AAK member Besnik Tahiri after the failure of the constitutional hearing has even commented on the VV's proposal for holding sessions, writes Periscope. Tahiri said the VV proposal to hold the session once a week is unconstitutional and experimenting, a “-ex1> for authoritarian transitional governance. Tahiri's full post: Session Proposal [...]
Tahiri said the VV proposal to hold the session once a week is unconstitutional and experimenting, a “-ex1> for authoritarian transitional governance.
Tahiri's full post:
The proposal for sessions once a week is:
An unconstitutional proposal.
Our intention to normalise constitutional violations through the involvement of all acts of acts in violation.
The experiment, a <x0- welcome” for authoritarian transitional governance ʹ without the Parliament, even to the point that the head of the session could also be the President's task officer.
Adhering the message that the country can be held without new institutions emerging from elections, as long as justice institutions do not come up with a stance on conflict of interest between the prime minister's and MP's office.
This is:
Call for legitimacy of the blockade.
An invitation to the total collapse of institutional stability and power sharing.
For chaos.












