PSD: Someone who attacks democracy and violates free speech does not hand over power through consultations

The Social Democrat Party has reacted after today's conference by LDK chairman Lumir Abdixhiku, saying the refusal is the right response to Kurti. “Refusing is the correct response to Kurt. So did the LDK chairman today. Obadiah. We're not just talking about an unbelieving answer. It's the order of reasons that matter. Obadiah [...]
“Refusing is the correct response to Kurt. So did the LDK chairman today. Obadiah. We're not just talking about an unbelieving answer. It's the order of reasons that matter. Abdixhiku has started off well with the attack on democracy, freedom of expression, has cited the capture of independent and constitutional institutions, to the risk of national security and strategic alliances that Kosovo relies on. There are these fundamental reasons why Kurt should be rejected, not the resentment that comes from political everydayity. ”
The PSD further says the LDK's proposal is an impossible way.
From this party, they have said that “Somebody who attacks democracy, which violates free speech, who seizes independent institutions will not give up power through consultations”.
However, unfortunately we should say that this action is a proper action in the context of a misty path of abstention. That's because the LDK proposal is an impossible way. The LDK is proposing a National Transitional Government. According to them, following meetings and consultations of Albanian parties and those from non-US communities, the road ahead is simply reconciliation for an executive without Albin Kurti. If we take Abdidjik's assessments of Kurt's four-year work, and put them in front of “choice” offered, we would see at least a logical contradiction. Someone who attacks democracy, who violates free speech, who seizes independent institutions does not give up power through consultations. Which autism has handed power to the table? None until today. ”
The PSD adds that what we see in the form of a proposal is “lack of readiness to take responsibility”.
There are no illusions. This proposal is not the way forward. What we see in the form of a proposal is in fact a lack: lack of willingness to take responsibility. It's called the parliamentary majority of last opposition that creates the new government.”/Periscopi/












