MP PDK: To overcome crisis, we also gave up the prime minister's post

According to him at the time, there have been some vaccines that have not had sufficient clarity but have been clarified by the Constitutional Court's decision and then everything has been going on in that process as envisioned in that decision.

Demaku has said that even at the time the Democratic Party of Kosovo has been co-operative because of the country's interest, even giving up the post of prime minister, who belonged to him as the first winning force.

And it's not the same situation at all, it's a very different situation, it's a whole different situation, and then that approach has been, but even at that time, there have been some vaccines that haven't had enough clarity that the Constitutional Court has clarified with the verdict and everything has been going on in that process as the Constitutional Court's decision has predicted and we've come out of that situation and we've moved on with institutions. The Democratic Party is well remembered at the time it was co-operative, it was institutionalist parties reaching agreement and giving up the prime minister's office that we were as the first political force in the country we had won. Our leader of the time he gave it up because of the country's interest and we had the agreement with LDK”, he said.

He added that Albin Kurti and the Vetevendosje Movement have had incorrect access to political oponents with the offensive language used that, as he said, influenced to create some kind of division and polarisation not only on the political scene but also on the citizens of the country.

Similarly, Kurti's letters are bad for Demak, since in his opinion they do not serve the country and are not for the benefit of institutions.

“Albin Kurti and the Vetevendosje Movement have had a poor approach, not institutional, not correct with the public, nor with political opponents that his rude language is known anymore, his low insults which lower him rather than others, and all he has contributed to create some kind of division, a polarization not only on the political scene but also on the citizens of the country. So instead of affecting educational and cooperative policies and even citizens, he has consistently influenced an offensive language for political opponents by making a deep division in our society that is harmful to all. Even this last game of these selective letters that you do not do this does not serve the country, it is not in the best interests of institutions that a leader who wins the elections should be much more pragmatic to have more democratic access and should be responsible in relation to what he represents and that he has the right to submit the processes before”, Demaku is expressed. /tat1/Periscopi/