8 hours agoKurt's talking about the invitation he sent to Abdixhik doesn't stop before journalists (VIDEO)
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Vetevendosje Movement Chairman Albin Kurti has not spoken of the invitation he sent to Abdixhik for the meeting, Periscopi broadcast. Kurti, after the break of the Parliament's constitutional hearing, has come out and has not stopped before journalists to declare the letter to the LDK chairman, this letter, which looks more like “Call [...]
Kurti after the break of the Parliament's constitutional hearing, has come out of the country and has not stopped before journalists to declare the letter to LDK chairman this much like “calls for a” coalition with them.
Abdixhiku, who has twice refused to meet with him, Kurti tells him that “political agreement is needed”.
“I am convinced that LDK voters today prefer the coalition to LVV. Even LVV voters prefer the coalition with the LDK as well. Why not? LVV is not interested in coalition with the PDK. We can even go to new elections where little can change for LDK and then we'll have to sit together again for the LV coalition. V-LDK! Then why do it later when we can do it now? Why is there even one choice for the same coalition?
LVV's chairman tells the LDK chairman that “would rather be” would be meeting.
Of course, it would be best to meet and talk and discuss these as mature politicians who have the future of the state and priority social progress above any other”.
Full letter:
Honored chairman of the Democratic League of Kosovo, Mr. Lumir Obadiah,
I'm addressing you with this letter since we haven't met yet. LDK MPs have recently publicly declared that political agreements are needed to move forward in the ninth legislature, originally with the constitution.
As chairman of Movement V DEPENSE! and incumbent prime minister of the Republic of Kosovo, I am interested and willing for political agreement with the LDK.
We certainly have differences in political conviction and governing policies, but coalitions are made right between those who have differences, establishing the rights and needs of the state and citizens as priorities.
The LDK is known as the party, which has not hesitated for governing coalitions -- in 2001-2004 with PDK and AAK in 2004-2007 with the AAK -- in 2008-2010 with the PDK in 2014-2017 again with the PDK, meanwhile in 2020 with LVV.
The differences the LDK may have with LVV today are no bigger than the LDK had before the previous coalitions when it made them. Plus, in 2020 we were colleagues at Kurt 1, when I didn't have any problems with you, but with some others who no longer have high positions or great influence in LDK as they did.
I am convinced that LDK voters today prefer the coalition to LVV. Even LVV voters prefer the coalition with the LDK as well. Why not? LVV is not interested in coalition with the PDK. We can even go to new elections where little can change for LDK and then we'll have to sit together again for the LV coalition. V-LDK! Then why do it later when we can do it now? Why even one choice for the same coalition?
Of course, it would be best to meet and talk and discuss these as mature politicians who have the future of the state and priority social progress above any other.
