9 hours agoHasan for the secret vote: If the Court gets into this, the country goes into chaos.
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)The former head of the Constitutional Court, Enver Hasani, has commented on sending the subject to Constitutional for changing the form of voting for the election of the Speaker of the Parliament, the issue sent by the AAK. In his opinion, entitled “Serish on “The fool's game”, he has shown that in this case the Constitutional Court has two possibilities: [...]
In his opinion, entitled “Serish on “The game of the fool”, he has shown that in this case the Constitutional Court has two possibilities: not to address this request, or enter its merits.
If the court refuses to address this requirement, according to Hasan, the Constitution will make a major mistake.
He has suggested that this act of the court would put the country in great chaos, followed by Periscope.
“Timed earlier, some MPs exploited their constitutional right and raised a constitutional issue at the Constitutional Court. According to media reports, the issue has to do with changing voting and the negative or refusing decision of most MPs to deviate from the agenda of April 8th 2025, appointed by the former head of the Assembly and parliamentary political forces. It may be that the Constitutional Court will not want to address this request or enter its merits that this remains to be seen. In both the first and second cases, the Court must give clear reasoning. If it happens first, the country will be in even greater chaos because politics will translate this as a victory for the current Morbyd interpretation, which is made to paragraph 128 of the 2014 Constitutional Court Act, in the case of V LAN II. This act, pure and clear as the Heaven of Dante's Paradise, is being interpreted in such a morbyd, arbitrary, completely barbarous and primitive way, that we who were participants in his design have difficulty believing that we could once imagine such an interpretation, not even in the worst dream”, wrote.
According to him, the court's refusal to handle this case would set a dangerous precedent.
Any Constitutional Court decision lacking clarity or courage to examine and decide on the merits of the case creates a new precedent and represents the invitation for institutional chaos, today and the future. This is because any constitutional institution of the Kosovo Assembly after the national elections will be left to stihiia and the conjuctural report of political forces, personal whims of the leaders of the case”, he wrote.
