The founder confirms the indictment of spying on Bedri Shaban and Muharrem Kerim

“Rejecting evidence objections and requests for dropping the indictment, submitted by defendants: Bedri Shaban, av. Berisha and Muharrem Qerim, av., Betim Shala, exercised against the Act of Special Prosecution of the Republic of Kosovo,..., the 1902.2025”, is said to be in the ruling, provided by “Justice Voctizen3>.

Saban's lawyer claims

Under the ruling, Shaban's defence attorney, Besnik Berisha, has reportedly filed a request to drop the indictment on the grounds that evidence listed in the indictment has been illegally received.

According to the ruling, the lawyer Berisha reportedly claims the order issued by the Supreme Court of Kosovo does not specify against whom the subjects issue the surveillance measures and how such an order does not contain sufficient reasoning.

Also, in his claims, lawyer Berisha has said that according to his decision, the telephone and device received by Saban has no evidence to testify to their ownership.

Meanwhile, the lawyer Berisha for measures issued through the Constitutional Court's ruling do not meet the legal standard and the suspicion therefore as such the court's action is against its laws.

Meanwhile, Shaban's responses published in the media according to Berisha must be declared unacceptable, as there are no elements linking Shaban to them.

Meanwhile, the claim that Srdjan Rocis was said to have Shaban communications with him is part of the Serbian secret service, according to lawyer Berisha, The PSRK has not confirmed it with a single test.

Determine Lawyer Claims

According to the Foundation's decision, the lawyer Shala has filed a request to challenge the evidence and demand to drop the indictment.

According to Shala, with no single proof P The SRK has not proved that with the actions of Qriminance, judicial order in Kosovo has been jeopardised, and that most of the evidence provided by the Prosecution has been public.

On the other hand, according to Shala, evidence attached to the indictment does not confirm the actual situation and that elements of the criminal act for which Qrim was charged are not fulfilled.

Likewise, Shala has claimed that the government's trip to Serbia to meet with Srdjan Roci has been for health purposes and that crossing the border does not constitute criminal acts.

Prosecutor's Answers to Defence Claims

The prosecutor within the deadline has sent answers to the defenders' claims concerning the request for contesting evidence and dropping the indictment.

In response, the prosecution has proposed to the court to reject these objections and requests for dropping the indictment as groundless.

According to the court's assessment, based on the claims of the parties and the prosecution's response, it has come to the conclusion that there is a well-founded doubt that the accused have performed the works they are being charged with.

Based on evidence listed as an indictment, the Court has found that there is a well - founded doubt that Shaban and Qrem each have already committed the criminal act of spying.

And that according to the court at this stage the standard of well-based doubt has been met, and all of this is based on evidence attached to both the indictment.

According to the court in relation to the accused Shaban from the telecom surveillance with Rosic, information, documentation and reports concerning the Kosovo Liberation Army war (UÇK).

Information according to the court's decision is said to have been given to Rosic for KLA superiors, in the village of Molpolc of Shtime.

The court has also found that material and photos linking well - founded doubt that Shaban has committed the criminal work he is being tasked with have been found from Shaban's telephone examination.