7 hours agoBayraktari for the secret vote: Change of rules during dangerous process, include President
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Lawyer Ardian Bajraktari has commented on today's proposal to the head of the constitutional session, Avni Dehari, to elect the speaker of the assembly by a secret vote, naming the same as dangerous and seriously violating the transparency principle of the work of the people's elected. The lawyer also said that the assembly [...] was already present.
Lawyer Ardian Bajraktari has commented on today's proposal to the head of the constitutional session, Avni Dehari, to elect the speaker of the assembly by a secret vote, naming the same as dangerous and seriously violating the transparency principle of the work of the people's elected.
The lawyer has also said that the assembly is already in crisis and that the president's involvement is necessary and necessary.
Posting:
The range of transapernce since February 9, today I tried to cover it.
The change of rules during the process is dangerous, furthermore, the attempt to vote in secret on the occasion of electing the Speaker of the Parliament's/Kuptice seriously violates the principle of transparency of the work of the people's elected, which, although the job is being delayed, the salary is working.
The Assembly is already in crisis, for exiting which is to be consulted among political subjects represented in the Assembly, as well as reflection on their part, and in this direction the most responsible for the election.
When political subjects are heard, to get out of this situation, including the President as an institution with a legal and legitimate mandate, it is necessary, even necessary.
This is also determined with the Constitution, because it is the competence of the president/s, to guarantee the constitutional functioning of the established institutions with the Constitution.
It is noteworthy that as long as there is no decision-making on the part of the Parliament, the eventual address to the Constitutional Court, it can easily be an unreasonable expectation, because this latter could easily refuse to address the “issue”.
It should also be noted that the Constitution does not envision provisions or circumstances that, due to the failure of the people's elected to elect the Speaker of the Parliament, the country must go to new parliamentary elections, the Constitutional Court has said that even at 126th of the Act. November119/14 of 2014.
