Thaci declared innocent of new charges by special

His statement, Thaci has written it through defence on April 24th 2025.

“Thaci for the denial of guilt for each point and the charge in the amended Reconconfirmed Act, including the additional form of push for Points 1 to 3, is attached to these” parachutes, reported in Thaci's defence announcement, reports “JusticeBetim”, broadcast. Periscope.

On April 14th 2025, the judge of the preliminary procedure, Marjorie Masselot, has changed its earlier decision to conform an indictment, so confirming the form of criminal responsibility for Thaci that falls under KPRK's 32 (3) for pushing to commit the criminal act of <x0Pangim of official persons in carrying out the official duties of” on the basis of Article 401 and (5) of the KP.

Kosovo Specialised Chambers Court of Appeal ( The DPS) in The Hague has partially approved the prosecution's complaint to the decision to confirm the indictment in the case against Hashim Thaci, the Smajt Union, Isni Kilat, Fadil Fazliu and Hajredin Kuci, where a form of criminal responsibility for Thaci has been added in the case against justice administration.

Out of four points of the SPS complaint, only what Thaci had to do with promoting Kilajt, Smajt and Fazliu to carry out the criminal work of obstructing official persons in carrying out official duties was accepted.

The Appeals panel has decided that one of the four points Z had established The SP against the decision to confirm the indictment to Hashim Thaci, the Smajt Union, Fadil Fazlius and Hajredin Kuci, to accept it in terms of Thaci's criminal responsibility for inciting him to commit criminal work “Pingim of official persons in carrying out official duties”.

The fourth point of the SPS complaint involved opposing the judge's findings that Article 32 (3) of KPRK does not apply to the work of “Pegim of official persons” according to KPRK's Article 401 (3) and (5).

According to the ZPS, the judge was mistaken when it found out that because Article 401 (3) and (5) of the KPRK does not provide for sentences of up to five years in prison, thus Article 32 (1) is not applicable because this provision applies only to acts that are punishable less than five years.

According to the SPS, the preliminary procedure judge has erred by stating that, because the Article 401 (3) and (5) of the KKP envisions punishment from one to five years in prison, Article 32 (3) was not applicable, as this provision applies only to acts punishable by at least five years in prison. Thaci's defence had said the judge has correctly interpreted this article.

KPRK Article 32 (3) for “Push” says that “Anyone who deliberately pushed the other person to commit criminal acts punishable by at least five (5) years of imprisonment and criminal acts has not even been attempted, the driver is convicted of attempted”.

According to the panel, the judge had concluded that the work that falls at KPRK's Article 401 (3) is punishable from 1 to 5 years in prison, so she ruled out Thaci's responsibility according to Article 32 (3) of the KPRK for point 1, 4 and 4 of the indictment.

In addition, the panel had said there are disagreements about the interpretation of this article, as according to them, the lower panels have interpreted that this article is applicable to criminal acts punishable for over five years and some for those punishable under five years.

The decision reportedly has agreed by majority of votes with the SPS, saying Article 32 (3) must be applied to acts that include or even exceed five years in prison.

“As a result, the panel finds, by majority of votes, that since the work of preventing official persons is punishable in its hard-loaded forms of imprisonment from one (1) to five (5) years, the third form of promotion under KKP's Article 32%3 is applicable in this case”, the decision said.

As a result, they considered this article's judge's decision to be wrong was not applicable to the “Pegim of official persons in performing official duties”. So the panel, agreed to four points of SPS complaint.

Because the consisting of a well-based suspicion that Thaci has urged Fazliu, Smakajan and Cilajn to carry out the criminal work of obstructing official persons includes an actual assessment of the evidence, the issue goes back to the Pre-Procedure Court for further review of”, the decision is said to be further.

Otherwise, in this case the Smaj Union, Fadil Fazliu and Isni Kilaj were arrested on December 5th 2024 in Kosovo and transferred to the detention facility in DrsK, on December 6, 2024, under the confirmed indictment and reported arrest by The Hague.

While, Thaci has been handed over to the warrant at the detention facility at The Hague on December 5th, 2024, always according to the DK's announcement.

In contrast, Hajredin Kuci has been handed over to the confirmed indictment and the call to appear before the court of preliminary procedure for the initial presentation, which was held on December 9th.

According to the indictment, Thaci individually and through joint actions with groups; The band Fazliu (Fadil Fazliu and Fahri Fazliu), the Smaj Group (Bashkim Smaj, Blerim Shala and Artan Behrami) and the Kilaj Group (Isni Kilaj and Vlasnim Mayoriu) have followed a pattern of conduct to prevent official persons from performing official duties.

The indictment says Thaci has led and participated in these efforts through his visits to detention facilities during the time he was detained under his trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

It says that members of the Fazliu Group, the Smaj Group and the Kilaj Group were co-ordinated to influence SPS witnesses during the privileged visits of July 2nd, September 9th and October 6, 2023.

As a result, three counts of obstructing the official person in carrying out official duties bear against Thaci three counts of violations of the procedure's secrecy and four counts of disobedience to the court.

While, Kilaj, Smaj and Fazliu are accused of trying to prevent official persons from performing official duties and disobeying the tribunal. However, Kuci has two counts of contempt of court. /Betimi justice