Nagip Krasniqi removed an indictment, other points changed

According to the indictment, Nagip Krasniqi in the quality of KEK's chief chief chief, Ymer Dragusha, in the quality of task manager of the procurement office and Isuf Zana, as representative of the company “Regenpi Zeqiri L. L. C”, accused that by their actions caused damage to the state budget of about 37m euros, reports “Justice Trust“, broadcast Periscope.

Through the ruling of April 23rd 2025, the Foundation has partially approved Krasniqi's protector's request, lawyer Virtue Ibrahimaga, throwing out Special Prosecutor's Act 6, and stopped the procedure for criminal work “The discovery of official secrecy”

At this point, Krasniqi was charged with revealing official secrets regarding the procurement procedures that were taking place in KEK, sharing them with the informal-Dejona Mihalin.

According to the ruling, as far as the I to V points of the indictment, criminal acts have been requalified, while the rest of the opposition put forward by lawyer Ibrahimaga is rejected as unfounded.

“Requacialize the criminal acts that Nagip Krasniqi is charged with from point I to V é indictment: Misuse of official position or authority, predicted by Article 414, paragraph 2, regarding paragraph 1 concerning Article 31 of KPRK, in a (1) criminal offence, following: Misuse of official position or authority, predicted by Article 1414, paragraph 2, regarding paragraph 1 related to Article 31 related to KPRK 77, said the decision.

So, according to the Court, once the indictment is confirmed, judicial examination into this criminal case.
The report with Krasniqi will be conducted for criminal work “The use of official position or authority” by Article 414, paragraph 2, concerning paragraph 1 concerning Article 31, related to Article 77 of the Penal Code.

However, the request for the drop of the indictment, submitted by the defender of accused Isuf Zana, lawyer Artan Kerkin, has been denied.

The finding of the Court for the I-V points of the indictment in relation to accused Nagip Krasniqi:

After praising the attorney's claims, the SPRK's response, indictment and evidence supporting the indictment, the Foundation estimates there is good-founded doubt that the provisions of the criminal act, next “The use of official position or authority”, envisioned by Article 414, paragraph 2, concerning Article 31 related to Article 77 of the Penal Code.

According to the Court, the indictment is based on evidence that is sufficient to prove the well-based suspicion that the accused has committed the newly qualified criminal act. The well-based suspicion results in evidence the prosecution filed with the court.

The Foundation also emphasizes that the evidence in this criminal case has been legally taken and that they are not in conflict with legal provisions, so it must be passed into judicial consideration.

“So, in a report with indictee Nagip Krasniqi, well-founded doubt is confirmed by the testimony of co-operative witness Ymer Dragusha, who in his testimony confirms that he was the task of acting with executive procurement office director, and in this quality has also participated in tenders that are the object of this charge, where chief executive chief Nagip Krasniqi, initially insisted that the tender be carried out in a negotiated procedure with the TU company, arguing that this is specialised and conditioned for products and services, later hired, which is later followed by an accelerated procedure and tender, but was originally ordered by the 15202th procedure. TUB Hellas”, sending contacts to this company for e-procuration”, says the decision.

It says that even in relation to the “Bleran tender for monitoring the project's design implementation, supply and handling of jobs related to the offices of B1 and B2 in TC Kosova B”, the witness has declared that the chief chief chief chief chief insisted on negotiating with the company “TTUV Hellas”, arguing that this company is specialised in this area and can provide quality surveillance, which is later signed contracts.

While the decision to classify this tender as a nontransparent procedure, Dragusha has said it was taken by the chief executive chief through an e-mail directed to him and Abednego Kabashi, while determining a request as emergency is the responsibility of the research unit, not his or procurement.

“From the tender files that are the object of this charge, proposed as evidence, comes that these tender procedures were developed mainly through negotiation, thus avoiding regular procurement procedures and that this was always done according to the demands of the chief chief, accused Nagip Krasniqi, respectively, with which there is also suspicion given that the public procurement law” was violated, the decision said.

In contrast, from the e-mail exchanged by the accused with the collaborative witness, the Court finds that Krasniqi had ordered the procurement office for signing contracts, despite reports recommending non-fulfillment of conditions.

Always according to the decision, the suspicion based on a report on point II, which concerns the commitment of a legal consulting company for KEK, stems from electronic communication on the “>WhatsApp”, where it is seen communication between the accused Krasniqi and accused Isuf Zeja, who chat about this procurement activity, and precisely the winning company of the accused Zeynepa, even though the CRPP's opinion was to observe the open procurement procedure.

According to the Court, evidence shows Krasniqi was involved in two other tender procedures conducted through negotiation.

“So, for III points of the prosecution dealing with procurement activity “The slippery tablets on PF-Canals of coal mills”, from the proposed evidence, proved that the accused Krasniqi was aware that in an open tender procedure no change of conditions is allowed, respectively, changing many of the tender guarantees, and despite that the terms of the tender's economic operator <x3ENGERMERCHERCHECHCHCHEW The S.A., as well as in advance, invites him to apply in the tender, which is of course based on violation of the Public Procuration Law”, says the verdict.

Even in relation to the IV point, which concerns the tender “The license of services for oversight of project implementation: Disaine, supply, and handling of jobs related to the management of B1 and B2 cables at TC Kosova B”, the Court finds that the evidence results in the knowledge that the accused had demanded that this procurement activity be carried on with negotiated procedures, specifying OE “Tuv Hellas” from Greece, despite the fact that the same was aware that this type of activity should be carried on in open procedure, in opposition to the LPP rules, respectively, at 3nd to 7x2>TWWWWWWWVE and LPP's open procedure to bring it back to the procedure.

Also, the Foundation finds that in relation to the V point of the indictment, which is related to the procurement activity “The additional work in the repair of the E9 excaver E9 .4 .Takraf”, out of material evidence there is doubt that the defendant after failure with the OE “Bahrini Asllani”, links contract with OE “Takraf <5>, while the OE <x6hrhril <7) allows the work without contract or other than the operator <8th), what the rules of the procurincate.

Thus, the Foundation came to the conclusion that from these trials and other evidence attached to the indictment, there is a doubt that the defendant committed the criminal acts he is accused of as the device of the indictment, and of
Requalified as an ongoing criminal offense.

Unfounded, the Court finds the defense claim for lack of evidence to prove the suspicion based on each point of prosecution, because it estimates that evidence is sufficient to argue that there is established doubt
Okay.

The court estimates that it takes into account the description of the actual situation, in this case more criminal acts in “following”.

“ ... criminal acts that Nagip Krasniqi is accused of meet the conditions to be considered an ongoing criminal offense. This is because there are some of the same works, that is, there are five works, in time bindings, by the same masterpiece, 4 of them are in consequential, and as such, there are more than two of these conditions, because more than two are fulfilled. So in the concrete case, the object of the criminal act is the same for all points, then considering that in this case we are dealing with the actions of the accused in the quality of the official person as chief executive chief of KEK, and where all actions are undertaken in this quality”, the decision says.

It is also stressed that damaged is the same and that the desire of the perpetrators -- material gain -- is the same. The same is said to be the period when criminal acts are allegedly committed.

Regarding the defender's claim that the prosecution has failed to take into account excusing evidence, the Court recalls that during the trial it may present evidence that they consider to be in their favour. Thus, according to the Court, no matter what the claim may be, it is not the legal basis for dropping the charge.

Even in terms of the claim that the defence has not been given the opportunity to face financial experience and reject it, the Court estimates that the case belongs to judicial examination.

As for the claim of lack of harm, the Foundation stresses that the expertes have calculated a value of harm, but that this issue will also be proven during the trial.

Unfounded, the Court has also found the claim of protection that evidence has been illegally taken and contrary to legal provisions. Some electronic equipment had been confiscated by Krasniqi, including two computers, a notebook and an ECCO bill. According to protection, the evidence produced by electronic devices has been effectively provided.

“From the related evidence comes that the control has been retroactively approved by the judge of the preliminary procedure, in accordance with KPP Article 108, then even the examination of electronic devices is issued at the order of the pre-procedure judge, specifically with the ordinance. PPPS.nr.20/2023, 2906,2023, where is it?
Ordering equipment testing as mentioned in the ordinance”, the decision says.

The court estimated that the defence proposal to declare illegal evidence was general. The Foundation thus found that evidence provided by the Prosecutor's Office has been taken in accordance with legal provisions, while their provative value will be proven after maintaining judicial examination.

Thus, the first degree emphasizes that defence claims to declare unacceptable evidence are groundless and that in their absence, it cast the charge against the accused.

“The court as far as the indictment is concerned and re-qualification, considers there are no circumstances which rule the criminal responsibility of the accused, failed to establish prosecution, amnesty or pardon, and that sufficient evidence exists which supports the based suspicion and that it should be passed into judicial consideration where it would be meritably placed on the matter”, the decision said.

The court's findings of the VI point of the indictment in relation to accused Nagip Krasniqi:

After assessing the defence claims, indictment and evidence supporting him, the Constitutional Court in Pristina found that the request submitted by the defender of accused Nagip Krasniqi for throwing the indictment in relation to criminal work “State of official secrecy” is based.

After analyzing the subject's paperwork, the Court estimates that in this criminal case, the fact that the accused in the indictment had sent Dejona Mihali's information during their communication on various social networking platforms. But according to this Court, the question is that these information was of the nature of the “official secretion”.

The court stresses that, according to the indictment, the accused Krasniqi allegedly uncovered official secrets by sharing information with Mihali, which had not been public, even though the legal provisions or the decision on which these information were considered as official secret.

“From the definition given to the notion “official secreter”, it turns out that to complete the elements of the criminal act under paragraph 1, information or document sent down must be declared as official secret, whether through a law or through a decision of a competent organ based on any legal provision, and yet the discovery of it may have caused or caused harmful consequences to<3>, the decision is said.

Therefore, under the verdict, Krasniqi was not determined at any moment to be carrying such information to Dejona Mihali.

According to the Court, information in the conversation cited in the indictment has not been specified as an official secret, and no single evidence has proved to be official information -- secret.

In the concrete case, the Court estimates that sending these information from Krasniqi to Mihali, which has not exercised any public office, could be considered a violation of the work duties and that this could be a violation of the disciplinary nature, depending on the ECK's internal regulations.

Of all of this, the Court has concluded that the actions of the accused, as described in the device of point VI of the indictment, that is, the delivery of information as specified at this point, have not been declared by law, nor by any decision of any competent body as the official secret, and therefore fail to meet the conditions to be considered as a criminal and official discovery by Article 426, par. 1, of the KPRK, and as such acts do not constitute criminal acts under this article”, the decision is said.

Thus, the Court ruled to drop the indictment for criminal action “The discovery of official secrecy” and cease the criminal procedure, arguing that the work Krasniqi was tasked with, is no criminal offence.

The court's findings in relation to accused Isuf Zana:

The founder has found that the defense claims of the accused Zeynep at this phase of the procedure are unfounded.

According to the Court, suspicion based on reports to this indictment is confirmed by evidence listed on the case of the points to indict Krasniqi.

“So due to the related evidence there is suspicion that accused Isuf Zana has helped indictees Nagip perform the criminal act as in the indictment. So the evidence suggests that the accused Nagip, before opening the tender procedure for legal consultants, had sent the file to accused Isuf, who after looking back and finally announced the winner of this tender for legal consultancy, by signing the contract, with this well-founded suspicion of helping to misuse the official position, of accused Nagy Krasniqi<1>, is said to be in the decision.

The suspicion that the accused committed a criminal act of assistance, according to the Court, emerges from the fact that the accused Zeynep had accepted the file, and the fact that he was able to see it, change it, or even better adapt it to its terms and needs is well-based doubt that he helped them carry out the criminal act of abuse of official office or authority. It says that he had previously access to reference terms for this tender, the winner of the tender is announced with negotiated procedure and links the contract.

Regarding that the signed contract has not been implemented, the Court says these claims could be confirmed only after maintaining judicial review.

In the end, the Court has filed a 10-day complaint.

At the initial session held onFebruary 7, 2025Krasniqi and Zeynep have been declared innocent. Charged in this case is Ymer Dragusha, but the same has reached agreement with the Prosecutor on admitting guilt.

Special Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo (PSRK) on December 30, 2024 The new indictment against former head of the Kosovo Energy Corporation (KEK), Nagip Krasniqi, as well as Ymer Dragusha and Isuf Zeynep. Nagip Krasniqi and Ymer Dragusha are charged with “Use of official task”. Krasniqi was also charged with “Statement of official secrecy”. And Isuf Zamena is charged with “Help in carrying out the criminal offence of official task”. And, Dragusha has reached agreement on guilty admission with the Prosecutor.

In the indictment provided by “Justice Vow“, Krasniqi reportedly in the quality of KEK's chief chief, Dragusha in the quality of task manager of the procurement office and Zeynep, as representative of the company “Rexepi Zeqiri L. L.C”, charged that their actions caused damage to the state budget of about 37m euros.

The first point of the indictment device charges Krasniqi, who as KEK chief chief and Dragusha as the director of the procurement office of January 17th, 2022 to January 27, 2023, misusing office and official authority, have exceeded their competencies in order to benefit the other person - in this case economic operator “in S. Aʹ, they violate the rights of other persons as well as cause damage to Kosovo's budget.

The Actakuz says that by exploiting official positions, with the development of procurement activity appointed as the “Emergency capital resolution of the cable block A5”, have acted in complete opposition to rules defined by the No.04 Law. L-042 for Public Procuration in the Republic of Kosovo.

According to the indictment, on December 27, 2022, Krasniqi invites defendant Dragusha and witness Emin Tmava to his office, demanding that, contrary to the regulations of the LPP, start the market research procedure in order to start the negotiating procedure for the higher tender even despite the fact that defendant Dragusha suggests such a procedure is contrary to the regulations of the LPP.

But, in the indictment, it is said that despite the fact that he was aware that this act was illegal, according to the defendant Krasniqi's request, defendant Dragusha is calling from official Tmava to invite OE representatives “Intering) to the meeting, Operation Energy Security, and “Litwin S.A.”, which operators were previously declared irresponsible in the open procurement procedure.

And on December 29, 2022, Krasniqi and Dragusha are said to have been negotiating the tender for negotiating procedures, conducting negotiations with the above-mentioned economic operators, without being members of the commission for assessment-negotiation, and yet without the announcement being made to announce on the KRPP's e-procurement page, as of January 16, 2023 after the end of negotiations with this operator, has made the announcement for e-procurement, with {rast eliminated from the economic operators <x>Intering> S. P. This and Mounting Energy in order to favour the economic operator “Litwin S.A”.

The indictment says that following the elimination of two top operators, according to the January 2023 decision, defendant Krasniqi has established the commission for assessment-negotiating bid for procurement activity <x0)In its composition: Remzi Beshitrit '% chairman of the commission, Skender Isufi and Emin Tmava, members, have agreed, with the aim of holding negotiations with the economic operator “Litwin S.A.”, who in the report on the assessment of January 25, 2023, have concluded that this operator has not met the requirements in the tender file, and has not refrained from the promises given during the development of negotiations, recommending the annulment of this procurement activity because the economic operator had demanded change of the three conditions and that guarantee: reducing the bank, extending the deadline for a reduction and a reduced percentage of jobs.

Always according to the indictment, on January 26, 2023, defendant Nagip Kransiqi, despite the fact that he had been notified with the commission's report that the economic operator in question had failed to meet the tender terms, via e-mail confirms the terms of the economic operator “Litwin S. A” presented via e-mail on January 25, 2023, orders defendant Dragusha to sign the contract, which was signed on January 27, 2024, still without ensuring the bank guarantee that would be executed in case of the contract's failure.

So, as a result of the defendants' actions for July 19th, 2022 to May 6, 2023, the A5 bloc was out of office, so KEK was forced to import electricity in quantity of 890116 MWh, causing KEK and Kosovo budget Large damage, in the amount of 36 million and 349 thousand and 638 euros and 62 cents.

With this, they are charged that in co-ordination they carried out criminal work “Using official position or authority”, previously sanctioned and sanctioned with Article 414, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 and about Article 31 of the Penal Code.

At the second point of the indictment, Nagip Krasniqi and Ymer Dragusha are charged that between December 2021 and April 2023, deliberately, in co-ordination, in the quality of official persons, overcoming their competencies in order to enable the other person to enrich the economic operator “Rexhepi Zeqiriza L.L. CH and were violated by the rights of other persons who exercise such activities, in case of developing procurement activity appointed as “Aggression of a legal consulting company”, in regard to the procurement tender for negotiated procedure, has linked the contract to “Rexepi Zeqiri Zejra L. L. C” contrary to the rules set by the LPP.

The indictment says defendant Nagip Krasniqi had previously consulted reference terms with defendant Isuf Zamena, company shareholder “Rexepi Zeqiri Zejria L. L. C”, on March 2nd, 2023, has asked defendant Ymer Dragusha to initiate a negotiated procurement procedure for the commitment of legal counseling and procurement for chief executive and KEK staff, despite the fact that in the declaration of the needs and availability of funds DNPDF was not in advance, defining it as a single operator “Rexepi Zeqiri Zejra L. L. C”, with which there were close social reports on one side and on the other, this operator had been declared irresponsible in an open procurement procedure, knowing that an open procurement procedure must be carried out for such a process under the law.

On the other hand, defendant Ymer Dragusha, even though he was aware that defendant Nagip Krasniqi's request, was reportedly opposed to the LPP on March 2nd 2023, begins the procurement procedure, titled “Aggression of a legal consultancy company” through the paper directed. KRPP's. It says that in spite of the CAPP's recommendation, on March 6th, 2023, that open procedure must be carried out for this activity, defendants Krasniqi and Dragusha have conducted the negotiation procedure with economic operator “Rexepi Zeqiri Zekiri L.L.C.”.

Therefore, it is reported that on April 3rd, 2023, following Krasniqi's order, defendant Dragusha signed the contract with economic operator “Rexepi Zeqiri Zejria L. L. C” worth 60 thousand euros.

With this, they are charged that in co-ordination they committed criminal work “Using official position or authority” by Article 414, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 concerning Article 31 of the Criminal Code.

Always according to the indictment, at the third point, Nagip Krasniqi and Ymer Dragusha, during December 2022 until April 18, 2023, deliberately in co-ordination, in the quality of official persons, misusing office and official authority, have exceeded their competences in order to enable economic operator “Engrom S.A.”, violating the rights of other persons by inflicting damage to Kosovo's budget, with the case of developing procuration in open procedure, as a named <xPLAIocated in the PKK-Fkataktaktakts of the mills have been acting with full public rules, <4>

Initially, the defendant Krasniqi reportedly several months after the Public Procure Regulatory Commission's announcement (KRPP) for the tender, marked as the highest, illegally invites representatives of the economic operator “Ergotem S. A” from Greece, in order to pay a visit to the KEK location and contrary to the LPP rules, orders responsible KEK officials to submit technical tender specifications to this operator, yet without the announcement of the tender.

Insistance, according to the third point of the indictment, Krasniqi reportedly on December 15th 2022 in illegally and in violation of the principle of equality, rather than the discrimination specified in the LPP's Article 7, in an open procedure where no preliminary announcement of bidders is allowed, writes to UN indictees Dragusha and orders the tender to be announced on December 16, 2022, to be invited to the economic operator ) SBB) and economic operator <x0ndronem S.A”, presuming out competitors/the tender providers and then making the announcement of the contract.

On the other hand, it is said that after the completion of the bidding assessment process on the part of the assessment commission, economic operator”Ergomet S. A” is named winner of the tender and is invited to sign the contract, however, prior to the signing of the contract to economic operator Ergotem S. A” requires KEK, changing the terms of the tender, in particular with regard to the height of the bank guarantee that in the tender file was 50%, while the economic operator required 10%, for which indictees Krasniqi and Dragusha on March 21st 2023, at KEK offices, hold a meeting with representatives of the economic and illegal operator agree to the economic operator's request.

Thus, bank guarantees from 50% are said to drop to 15%, with cases signed on April 7th 2023 by defendant Ymer Dragusha, while on April 18th 2023, signed by defendant Nagip Krasniqi in the amount of 1 million and 621 000 and 544 euros and 20 cents.

Thus, under these actions Krasniqi and Dragusha are being tasked with co-ordination “Using official position or authority”, previously sanctioned and sanctioned with Article 414, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 related to Article 31 of the Criminal Code.

At the fourth point of the indictment, Nagip Krasniqi and Ymer Dragusha are again charged again, where it says on January 25, 2023, deliberately, in co-ordination, in the quality of official persons, the defendant Krasniqi as KEK chief executive chief and defendant Dragusha as a director of the procurement office, by misuse of office and official authority, have exceeded their competencies in order to benefit economic operator “ @TWAWCHAWCHCHAWCWCHEW and to violate the rights of other persons, as in the case of development of the ongoing operation, as recommended <2>Buying services for monitoring project implementation, design, supply and work related to deleting B1 and B2 in TC Kosova B”, have acted in complete opposition to the rules specified with the LPP.

According to the fourth points of the indictment, it is said that on January 24th, 2023 the announcement of the tender, the defendant Krasniqi wrote to defendants Dragusha and illegally obliged him to contact the economic operator “Tuv Hellas” and invite him to apply for tenders to negotiate, but KEK officials initially informed the defendant that the move was in opposition to the 7th genta, despite this defendant Krasni, via mail, the official Abashi that if he didn't act under official orders, the pressure and pressure, that the Mümqi was against the 7th company's command, and that offers the full command to the justice of the justice of the 20-day tender, because the declaration is being issued in charge of the 25-procull.

In addition, it is said that despite the announcement by officials responsible that no negotiated procedure can be carried out in the case of this tender, defendants have ignored the announcement and have continued with negotiated procedure only with the economic operator “TW Hellasque, whom the defendant Krasniqi had already chosen, has yet to announce the tender.

Always according to the indictment, during the negotiation procedure, defendants illegally favour this operator by cutting the tender criteria for bank guarantees from 50% to 10%, and despite the fact that the economic operator had no documentation in the tender file for the tender points like: reference for work, diplomas and certificates ISO 9001, given that during the negotiations procedure, defendant Nagip Krasniqi had personally had phone contact with the representative of this operator and was aware of the economic shortcomings that had been reported in the contract with the contract, which signed on March 303rd of the 628m euro.

For these actions, Krasniqi and Dragusha are charged with criminal work in co-ordination “The use of official position or authority”, according to Article 41, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 concerning Article 31 of the Criminal Code.

At the fifth point of the indictment, defendants Nagip Krasniqi reportedly on November 25th, 2022, deliberately misusing official duty has exceeded his competencies in order to benefit economic operator “bahri Aslan & FAM” and was violated by other people's rights, in this case economic operator “Takraf” and to do damage to Kosovo's budget, so that in the case of developing procurement activity in the negotiated procedure, the “Additional work on repairing E9 excavator spherical bed making” has seriously violated the rules set by the LPP.

The Actakuz says it originally ordered higher procurement activity, then developed the so-called initial negotiated phase with economic operator “Bahri Aslan & FAM”, but due to negotiating conditions, it has suspended negotiations with this operator and opened new negotiations with the economic operator “Takraf”, with which, after several meetings on July 26, 2022, reached an agreement that was not immediately executed due to conditions on the ground, so it was postponed until the creation of atmospheric conditions.

It says that despite the fact that with economic operator “Takraf”, there was an agreement agreed on as described earlier, defendant Nagip Krasniqi, via his official e-mails to economic operator “Bahri Aslan & FAM” and invites him to start work even though there was no signed contract, so that the economic operator in question, on October 18, 2022, had entered the location, while a month after November 25th, 2022, signed an annex-constrat with this operator worth 279 thousand and 72 euro 664 cents, worth three times as much as the agreement he signed with the economic operator <x4Traf<5>, discating the <6x@Tak> and causing damage to the EC and the Kosovo budget, at 90000 value.

So with these actions, Krasniqi is being tasked with criminal work “Use of official position or authority”, according to Article 414, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 concerning Article 31 of the Criminal Code.

The discovery of official secrecy from communications with Dejona Mihalin

The sixth point of the indictment, Nagip Krasniqi charged that in the 2022-2023 period, deliberately, consistently, in the quality of the official person has uncovered official secrets regarding procurement procedures that were taking place in KEK, sharing them with the informal person, Dejona Mihalin, respectively.Which does not hold any official position in the state administration, of which information had access as a result of his duty and which were not public.

On July 2, 2022, 8:21, says the indictment The PM, during communications on the social network WhatsAppı, with Mihali, has sent the information about KESH's abuse of electricity under the June 24th 2022 agreement between KEK and KESH. And on April 22, 2022, at 6:25 The PM, the defendant during communications on the social network égnalı, has sent two documents to Mihali for electricity exports for March-April 2022, following her acceptance of the news regarding the publication of information from Portal Ryporterão with the title “GEN company linked to Ambassador Berisha received 4.2m euros from Kosovo for two months of energy crisisOh.

However, it is said that on February 24, 2022, at 7:59, during communications on the social network '%Signal' has sent Michael a document entitled “Agent of the 09.02.2023s meeting, in which key points are included, as well as reference terms for the procurement, entitled “Legal Consultancy Services and regulators<62>. And on April 12, 2023, 4:25 The KEK's commitment to Gazmend Begolli has been submitted during communications on the social network '%s', a draft authorisation for the commitment of an external consultant for technical assistance to the KEK field sector, respectively.

On August 4, 2022, at 3:59 The PM, during communications on the social network '%Signal', has sent Mihali, a request to the Government of the Republic of Kosovo, respectively to Kosovo Prime Minister and Government Ministers for completion/reforming of the decision to declare emergency energy. On September 29, 2022 at 3:48 The PM, during communications on the social network WhatsAppı with members of the same group, has sent the table with the data/priced prices of six tenderers who have offered for procurement activities “cadda capital re-progress of turbine capital and generator”.

On October 13, 2022, 7:17 says The PM, during communications on the social network WhatsAppı, in Mihali's group, has sent the information which was accepted by the member of the assessment and negotiating commission, Skender Isufi, in connection with the number tender. KEKC-22-287-51, due to bids offered by economic operators, as well as other communications on these platforms. And that on May 16, 2022, during communications on the social network égnalı has sent Mihali, a communication-photo with the writing of three names and positions of officials at KEK: Driton Bytyqi, Emin Tmava and Mustafa Cavaja, after which the same answer is sent and for everyone but provides information on the profile of each of the upper ones.

By that, he was accused of committing criminal work “The discovery of official secrecy”, previously sanctioned and sanctioned by Article 426, paragraph 1 concerning paragraph 5 of the Penal Code.

Course, the 7th item point charges Isuf Zamen that during December 2021 until April 2023, in Pristina as company representative “Rexhepi Zeqiri Zeynep L. L. C” deliberately and with the aim of personal gain, has helped defendant Krasniqi misuse the official task in connection with the tender, titled “The engagement of a legal consulting company”.

Initiately, Krasniqi has reportedly helped Krasniqi in preparing the reference terms in the tender he has participated in, so Krasniqi has first sent a draft of the terms of reference for the tender to indictees Zeynep, where the latter returns the Draph to Krasniqi and then Krasniqi sends the same to the Procuration Office at KEK and urges them to initiate this procurement activity with negotiated procedure.

At this point, according to the indictment's point, it is said that the most understanding of this Public Procurement Regulatory Commission (KRPP) marks the letter through which recommends that this procedure should be carried out in an open procedure aimed at boosting transparency and competition, but the defendant Krasniqi due to close reports with defendant Zeyna ignores this recommendation, and on April 3rd 2023, signed the contract with the operator <x1nd>Rege Zekarika L. L.C”, with defendant Isuf Zeynep respectively, repaying him with the amount of 60 thousand euros.

So with these actions, Zeynep is accused of committing a criminal act of assisting in carrying out criminal work “The use of official position or authority”, according to Article 41, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 concerning Article 33 of the Criminal Code.

Details from the prosecution's statements and the police, as well as other details of the indictment, can be found: THESE.

We remember that former KEK chief chief Nagip Krasniqi, in yet another case, is accused of corruption, for which an indictment at the initial session, October 8, 2024 has been declared innocent.