KKUK's illegal director negotiated and signed the million contract

At the third point of Article 35 of the Law for Public Officials, it is said that the official/public can't be appointed as a fraud/in charge longer than six (6) months.

There at the third point further, it is said that when the position cannot be met within the six-month term, this deadline could last the most for another six (6) months.

At 4th point in this article further, it is said that the free position cannot be replaced by taskaries for longer than the deadline set in paragraph 3. This article.

And until 5th of Article 35 it is said that any decision taken by the task officer, following the deadline set in paragraph 3. This article is illegal.

But Hajdari, former Vetvendosje Movement Asamist in Prizren's Municipal Assembly, is in position from January 29, 2024 - more than 14 months.

Hajdari has even signed a negotiated contract that initially weighed 1 million, but during negotiations the company that already has contracts to provide QKUK facilities has dropped to 700 thousand euros.

Hajdari in the late year's announced competition we left behind had applied for CKUK director, but the competition was cancelled by the USKKKU board.

Even in the recent competition, long ago Hajdari has applied again, but so far the process has not received any epilogue.

Dress: U.D. has the obligation to prepare preconditions for opening regular competition within six months

Former ally of the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) and former member of the Parliamentary Commission for Health, Shemsedin Dresey, told Front Online about the practice of holding temporary positions with task officers (U.d) at public institutions for longer periods than the law allows.

Dresj stressed that the role of task member is temporary and restricted by law, with a clear purpose.

“u.d is tasked with preparing preconditions for opening the fair contest, and this time interval by law is defined for six months, then becoming competition selection,” he said.

Beqa: Decisions and continuing position after six months as they were.

Former Kosovo Democratic Party (PDK) and former Minister of the Commission for Legislation Hajdar Beqa, for Front Online, has sharply criticised the practices of appointing senior public officials in the quality of task manager (U.D.) for periods longer than six months, citing this as a direct violation of the law.

“The position of senior officials, for the position of a U.S., but even with the Service Law it is not allowed to have a mandate of more than six months. Any passage of the six-month deadline is a legal violation,” Beqa said.

He stressed that responsibility for these violations falls on competent institutions.

“in this case is the responsibility of competent organs. ” he added.

According to him, these prolonged appointments are not random, but part of a deliberate government policy.

All the positions that are with the U.D. have been the tendency of the Government to manipulate and blackmail it” and point Beqa for Front Online.

Beqa also raised concern over decisions made by officials who have exceeded the legal deadline as task adviser.

“Even decisions and were.d after the mandate are contrary to the law. No performance with U.d.” finished.

Zymber: Maintaining U.D. position. for more than two mandates it's too much to comment and leave for fair

Kosovo Civil Service Union Chairman Mursel Zymberi has voiced criticism over the practice of appointing senior public officials in the position of task leader (U.D.) for extended periods, naming this practice as unacceptable and contrary to the Law's spirit of public officials.

You have the answer. The answer is well known,” he said, hinting that the issue is clear to anyone who recognizes legislation in power.

He added that current authorities are also trying to limit the mandates of elected officials through regular competitions, not just those appointed as U.D.

Now these guys are trying to limit the mandate when you're in the competition, let alone with the U.D. to continue two mandates. ” said Zymber.

In this context, SSHCK chairman also cited the return for review by the Constitutional Court of the Law for Public Officials, which aims to set clear criteria for the mandate and selection of public institutions' directors.

Until the Law for Public Official, the young man who's backed up from the JPC, who mandates the positions of public officials, tries to mandate and elects them professionally and continues with certain mandates...” he tried for Front Online.

He estimated that extending the exercise of office beyond two mandates seriously violates the principle of professionalism and fair competition.

“Already proceed with 2+2 or 4+4 with W. D, that's too much to comment, that's what's right. ” said Zymberi, head of SSHCK.

Legal dilemmas about task makers: VV MP says lack of legal clarity

The deputy of the Vetevendosje Movement and former Minister of the Commission for Health, Labino Demi-Murtez, for Front Online has commented on the question of taskeers in high public positions, raising questions about the legality of holding more than two mandates as U.D. Director in public institutions.

She acknowledged that the issue was not addressed with legal depth by the Ministry of Health or by relevant commissions.

“I'm not competent on this issue, or why there are cases,” said Demi-Murtezi, adding that although there has been discussions, a clear position has not been taken.

According to her, the problem is not directly related to health sector laws.

This is about laws relating to administration and not health,”

By focusing on practical experiences in administration, she mentioned past cases.
From practice we know that an official has surpassed three-four, five or six ministers by being W. D.” she added to Front Online.

Demi-Murtezi also acknowledged that different interpretations of current legislation exist.

There are different Narratives, different Narratives. These readings between the lines of law have occasionally been practiced. It's not this issue we haven't discussed, but it's not a matter that the Ministry of Health has taken. We only talk about laws we speak for ourselves,” she said

AV ONET: Maintaining W. D. - over 12 months is illegal and decisions are legally invalid

Shefki Berisha from the AVONET NGO network has raised serious concerns about the practices of some public institutions that are allowing officials to maintain the position of taskman (U.D.) beyond the legally defined deadlines.

According to Shefki Berisha from AVONET, this is openly opposed to the Law for Public Officials.

“According to the positive law for public officials, namely Article 35 of this law, the public official cannot be appointed as a fraud/in charge longer than six (6) months. When the position cannot be met within the six-month term (6), this deadline could last the most for another six (6) months,” said Berisha.

Based on the interpretation of this legal provision, he stressed that any excess of this deadline makes further decision-making in a judicial way invalid:

“A U.D. cannot exercise this position more than 12 months (1 year), and that the release of decisions under paragraph 5 of Article 35 of the law applicable to public officials, following the passage of the prior legal deadline 6 months + 6 months = 12 months, is illegal. So those decisions are considered legally invalid (nule),” he pointed to FrontOnline.

Berisha from AVONET has expressed deep concern for as it calls “responsibility” of some institutions that are not adhering to the provisions of the law in force.

“We are very concerned about the responsibility that some institutions are showing that are not respecting these judicial standards in power, which we consider to be seriously violating judicial security, and that the decisions of these institutions are taking arbitrary and not legal nature. ” he finished.

Year: QKUK leadership with task handler should not be allowed

Health field director Bujar Vitija has said that it would not be necessary for the CKUK to be led by Bridgers, saying this is the responsibility of the USKKUK Board, which has not yet formed a commission for this affair.

As far as I know, USKKKUK has requested clarification from DMZP for continuing the mandate of the QKUK director's task manager. After these clarifications, his mandate,”, said the Year.

He highlighted the responsibility of the USKKUK Steering Board for failing to meet legal and procedural obligations.

The leadership of the University Clinical Centre of Kosovo with a task maker should not be allowed. This is the responsibility of the USKKUK Steering Board, which has not yet formed the Select Commission for the competition, which has been closed for nearly three weeks. ” said the year. According to him, the problem is not limited to the QKUK.

And this is not only about QKUK, but also about two general hospitals in Mitrovica and Ferizaj, who are also guided by the task manager. ” he added.

The year particularly highlighted the case of Ferizaj's hospital, calling it extreme.

The hospital in Ferizaj has been in the U.D. for years. ” concluded journalist Vitija.

Front Online has sent questions towards KKUK to answer why Osman Hajdari is going to remain like W. D The QKUK's and to ask whether his position in this position is illegal, but until the publication of this article, no response has been made from KKUK. Also, Front Online has sent questions to the State Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo to answer whether the U.D. case of KKUK is being investigated, but not by P. The SHRK has not received answers until the release of this article. /Periscope/