There is or no government resignation

Although summoned to resign, Albin Kurti and his subordinates continued to exercise executive office by holding government meetings and making decisions. From the government hall, Kurti said she is on duty, but according to him the exercise of executive function is legal as he mentioned examples when past governments [...]
Although summoned to resign, Albin Kurti and his subordinates continued to exercise executive office by holding government meetings and making decisions.
From the government hall, Kurti said it is on duty, but according to him the exercise of executive function is also legal as he cited examples when past governments remained in office until the new government was formed.
This is not possible. More than that would be abandoning the institution, it would be institutional vacuum, political responsibility and national security risk. It's request and persistence, to say the unequipped butt to leave the house without a home owner. Meeting today and exercising other governmental competencies are completely legal, even legally binding. We have limited functions, but there can be no official ban... In our history of forming institutions, we have examples from the past when a PDK-led government, although with the disbanded Assembly, an AAK-led government, though resigned, and an LDK-led government, though declared illegal, have remained in office until the formation of the new government. But a government led by the Vetevendosje Movement, although it has fulfilled its regular four-year mandate, we should leave its offices an hour and earlier”, Kurti said.
But at Article 26 of the Law for Government, it says that if a member of the incumbent government is elected MP of the Parliament, he should resign from the office of executive member before the day of the certificate of the election outcome, which did not happen.
At the Kosovo Democratic Institute, they say in this case the exercise of executive office by Kurti and others constitutes violations of the Government law. According to researcher Volnet Bugakku, yesterday Kurti's letter is not a resignation.
Looking at yesterday's letter delivered strangely to the Kosovo Parliament, this letter is not that it has legally the features of a retired letter looked like the same announcement that was addressed to the speaker of the assembly, even though at the wrong address because there is no need for the chairman... those resignations would have to be handed over in time as the Law on Government stipulates they would have to be delivered one day before the certificate of results, and not on the Day of the Certificate of the Parliament. There have been violations of the Law for Article 26 government and constitutional violations as well. Some of the decisions and initiatives that were taking place, whether in the appointments of members of the boards, conflicted with the law for the Article government. 31 and I find it meaningless and unreasonable that the same ones called to resignation take action that violates provisions for the law for government, Bugakku told RTV21.
That Kurti and other government members are violating the Law on Government, lawyer Hasan Shala says, who estimates there is no government resignation.
According to that document ... it is not the resignation a written document and directed to the relevant institution. The resignations must be individual. The concrete case is a typical violation of the Government Law. ....”, Shala said.
On yesterday's day of the constitutional session Kurti sent a letter to former Parliament Speaker Glauk Konjufca, but aware of the Parliament Secretariat, announcing his resignation from the prime minister's post as well as to the government cabinet, which was not considered a resignation from the opposition.. /Periscopi/












