GLPS: Counter-unconstitutional has started since March 27th.

The Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo has failed to hold the Constitutional session of the ninth legislature, following the February 9th parliamentary elections. The session was interrupted without successfully closed, as a result of the commission's failure to verify mandates and quorums from a large portion of MPs. And about the situation created [...]
The session was interrupted without successfully closed, as a result of the commission's failure to verify mandates and quorums from a large portion of MPs.
And about the situation, a reaction has been made by the Committee for Jury and Political Studies. Through five points, the Group for Jury and Political Studies says the anti-unconstitutional situation began on March 27th.
I. The constitutional situation began on March 27th, when the Central Election Commission has certified as deputies, contrary to the Constitution, which simultaneously held executive office.
2 / 1 In this context, the “Mandati of Kosovo's Parliamentary MP starts on the day of the Certificate of the election score” 1 and “ [this/this/last] ... cannot hold any executive post in public administration. Nor should any other executive function . . .”
3 / 1 Members with executive office have not been obliged to resign but have to choose which post to hold (or neither) but not both.
Those.
6 / 1 Since some certified deputies on March 27th have enjoyed executive post, therefore, with the Certificate of the same deputies on the part of the CEC, the 4 constitutional constitutional status that continues today.
V. Based on Article 70.3.3 of the Constitution, the mandate of MPs holding executive office simultaneously, since the certificate should be considered as the invalid “”/” terminated.” Therefore, neither any eventual verification of the same mandates by the Kosovo Parliament's Verifiating Commission can restore the validity of these mandates.
6 / 15 Since the legal scene in Kosovo is sometimes subordination to extra-legal considerations, this GLPS stance cannot be prognosis, but diagnosis. G The LPS guarantees the accuracy of this attitude, but of course not for materializing the same. /Periscope/












