Renagon Veliaj: Living by Prosecutor's Order and Court Decision

Tirana Mayor Erion Veliaj has again reacted from cell with a status on social networks, expressing his concern over the consequences of justice decisions on family life.

He accuses Special Prosecutor (SPAK) and the Anti-Corruption and Organised Crime Tribunal (GJKKO) of the impact that, according to him, had their own decisions on the family and especially on his son.

According to the court ruling, my child has now received the status of the orphan, and the responsibility for his upbringing has surpassed his grandmothers. They should take over parental duties, taking them out of school, and escorting them to after - school activities,” writes Veliaj on his status.

Full response without interference:

By order of the court prosecutor!

Good afternoon, friends of infinite kindness who have given me this week so much love and courage!

Would you like to have some fun at the Ol's Dado violin at my hostage hearing, the slaughterhouse of my girlfriend?

When Ayala demanded a reduced precaution from house to house arrest in return because of the need to care for at least one of our parents for our six-year-old son, prosecutors' reasoning was that our son has two grandmothers! Thus, by court order, the child's status is appointed, and the responsibility to raise it rests with grandmothers! They can replace a parent's role in taking him out of school or in accompanying him to after - school activities, the loser violinist said. Grandmas could even keep ranks to buy food according to their own, even though they have no idea whether the grandmothers are in good health, driving, or not driving, to become servants of the child declared “jetim” and without access to bank accounts under Spak's command, and so on.

And beyond that, let's just say that the poor grandmothers would follow Spak's orders and learn about the car, the prosecutors, the ratio between grandmother and grandson is almost equal to that of the mother and son, at the point that Grandma is a man of the house, even when she doesn't live with her daughter, the mother of her son. Normal to this point the view of Grandma, but then how is it that the same brain that had the same reason for it, also argues that finding nephew's toys in Grandma's beach house, which our dead grandfather bought when her grandson was born and his daughter was still married, is a clear proof that that home is actually our hidden asset!

Thus, the same prosecutors, who are at the same time parents (who do not know whether they have grandmothers, but who must have them), think that their grandmothers are people of the house and can without a doubt take the mother's role for their grandson, but it can't happen in their grandmothers' homes to find toys of their 6 - year - old nephew. More than that, on the beach, where I don't believe my son is the only child who is eager to go to Grandma's house to meet with his toys.

And I have one question: And even if it's our home, that only the brain of a lullaby like the violinist who fell in on me might know why I should hide it in my statement if I had it, could my son's toys be enough to prove it or that my wife calls her friends to her mother's beach for her birthday?
Probably, but not in democracy and never in Europe.

A big hug for all grandparents and grandmothers! Fill your grandchildren with love, that warm - grown children do not become complex losers like tired construction swimmers, which have fallen on me for hiss! Heads up!