News Tara: Witnessing for UNMIK is fiction like missing document from prosecutor

Witness Ismet Tara declared in The Hague that document The 2001 UNMIK, which allegedly contains his statement, is fiction like the document he claims lost from the prosecutor, whom he has requested from Monday at the Court. A document presented to the Witness UNMIK of 2001 and [...]
A document presented to the Witness UNMIK of 2001 and was asked whether it is accurate that it has placed crosses on these texts during its interview in 2019 at the Specialised Prosecutor's Office after failing to comply with them, reports the “Justice bet“.
This document is not even mine. I've never met this Anna Vanozin, never, ever”, Tara said.
He said this document was written by someone unknown to him for whom he has never met, and who therefore holds the witness's signature.
There's nothing accurate, but I'm showing that this document was described by someone unknown without ever meeting me because otherwise it was after my signature. I do not issue unsigned documents, I am not the Ismet Tara at this time leading her to Ismet Tara for this problem. This is fiction like the document the prosecutor has lost”, Tara said.
This document, according to the witness, is described according to Anna Vanoz's will, claiming there was no knowledge of the document in question until 2019.
This document is not valid for me. This document for me presents nothing, this is a fictional document, and whoever did it doesn't know”, Tara said.
He said that many times he tried to accept this document, but he said it wasn't possible, and that's why he had crossed the cross (X) after his sʹwast.
Prior to this, the witness was told that in the case of Dedic, he allegedly warned the Dedic family not to leave their home because it was impossible to control the population even half the villages.
The witness's answer was not answered. But he claimed that he had no duty, nor could the population be controlled.
As for Marko Jelic, the witness was asked whether it is accurate that his mother has reported her son's arrest in him.
There has come an official whose day I don't know. He's been asking 5-6 times that I was in charge of this person, Markon”, the witness said.
In this regard, he had also witnessed Jelic Stamena, wife of Marco Jeliq, which for SPS had declared that about June 16, 1999, it has witnessed the kidnapping and mistreatment of a neighbour of hers by KLA members.
While, on August 9, 1999, it is claimed that her husband had been taken from home by three KLA members in her presence. According to ZPS, Marko Jelic had never returned home and disappeared since then.
Stamena Jelic had declared that her mother-in-law had at the time contacted the KLA commander to get information about her son, but that he did not succeed.
The person responsible for Rahovecin was Ismet Tara. I heard from people in Rahovec that he was responsible for the disappearance of people in question. My mother-in-law when she went to report her son's disappearance, she went to meet with Ismet Tara personally. That's what she personally told me”, witnessed by Jelic in this case, but she denied meeting Tara personally.












