Supreme Court Breaks Down PZAP Decision, Yunik Gos to Revote

The Supreme Court has accepted the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo's complaint about the election process in the Yunik municipality and has overturned the PZAP decision. Under this Supreme decision, the Yunik municipality will go to revote because of the ongoing irregularities. “Election Paneli for Ances and Parastres, with the decision of ZL.Anr.217/2025, [...]
Under this Supreme decision, the Yunik municipality will go to revote because of the ongoing irregularities.
“The Electoral Panel for Anxiety and Parastre, with the decision of ZL.Anr.217/2025, dated 1510.2025, has ruled: Unrighted complaints against the political subject, the Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK), with the date of 14.10.2025, submitted by political subject to the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK), with the vote on October 12th. Against the above-mentioned ruling, the political subject Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK), headquartered in Unik, has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court, which disputes its legality, proposing that the Supreme Court approve the complaint as based, change the P verdict. ZAP ZL.Anr.217/2025, of the 1510.2025 date, so that the controversial decision to break down and illegally declare municipal elections and the Yunik municipality go to revote due to alleged complaints that have affected the election outcome”, it is said in the Supreme Act.
PZAP, in response to the complaint filed by the political subject Alliance for the Future of Kosovo <x01>, headquartered in Junik against his earlier-mentioned decision, rejected at 1st all complaints of complaint and proposed that the complaint of the political subject to the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK), with the headquartered in Junik as unbaised, as the decision was confirmed by Mr.Anr.217/2025, dated 15102025.
The Supreme Court of Kosovo praised the legality of the controversial decision, in the sense of complaint claims, complaints in complaint, and after reviewing even the subject papers, found that: The complaint is based.












