The prosecution rejects Wesley Clark's statement to material evidence

The Office of Specialised Prosecutor (ZPS) through a parachute has said that in principle it does not object that General Wesley Clark's statement is accepted in material evidence as long as it meets requirements under the 154 rule. And the prosecution's statement also points out that they do not even object to the change in [the] list....
Similarly, in the prosecution's statement, it is also stressed that they do not object to the change in the list of Thaci's defence evidence in order to include both this declaration and even the proposed measures under the 107th Rule, reports “Justice Trust“, conveys Periscope.
In response to the defence request regarding these provisions, the prosecution says that since Clark's proposed statement contains evidence with opinions related to important issues, they do not object to its admission under the 154 rule.
However, the prosecution estimates that if this material is accepted, proper care is needed in valuing this evidence.
“For the above reasons, the SPS does not object: (i) accepting the proposed evidence in the request, provided the 154 Rule criteria are met; (ii) the request for changing the test list; or (ii) the proposed measures of the Rule 107<18x1>, is said in the Prosecution's premeditation.
Meanwhile, on April 15th 2025, the prosecution has announced that it has completed presenting evidence in the case.
While, the defence had applied according to the 130th Rule, which envisions a request to drop any charges or charges altogether in the indictment. The decision on this requirement was made on 16 July 2025. According to the chairman of the panel, Charles Smith III, what he had sought protection was his failure to rely on war crimes claims involving incidents that occurred before May 1998 and after June 20, 1999.
The trial “Trug notes that incidents and events that have occurred at the time opposed by defence are not accusations within the understanding of the 130” rule, the chairman of the court, Charles Smith III, said.
As a result, this motion had been dropped with the reasoning that the court's authority is to bring down material that constitutes accusations involving time causes. While, the same day, the protection of the victims had presented its evidence, calling two expert witnesses to testify simultaneously.
In addition to testifying on July 16, 2025, the testimony of these two witnesses continued on July 17, 2025, ending the testimony of the victims' defense witnesses.
The Specialised Prosecutor's Office, on September 30th 2022, has handed over the confirmed amended indictment against Hashim Thaci, Kadri Veselini, Jakup Krasniqi and Rexhep Selimi, which consists of ten points on charges, where the latter are charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity.
On April 29th 2022, the Specialised Prosecutor's Office had handed over a amended indictment to Hashim Thaci, Kadri Wessel, Rexhepi and Jakup Krasniqi, where four indictees have committed war crimes even in Gjilan, Budakov and Semtish.
On November 9th 2020, in their first appearances, Hashim Thaci's Jakup Krasniqi has been declared innocent of the charges placed on them. Wessel has also been declared in his presentation on November 10th, as has Rexhep Selimi on November 11th.
The incident against Hashim Thaci, Kadri Veselin, Rexhep Selimi and Jakup Krasniqi is confirmed on October 26, 2020.












