Judge and Prosecutor's Cano, Appeals Elamporon P complaints SRK and defence in case of Arlind Manjuca and others

According to the indictment, Manjuka and Azemi are charged for the criminal act “The rush of divisions and failure to be”, while Elshani and Zenalaj are charged with “having submitted”. The same are accused of deliberately having harmed the injured, Pristina Foundation Court Judge Mentor Bajraktari and former special prosecutor Africa Shefkiu, reports “The Justice Vow bet“, broadcast. Periscope.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina on 7 March 2025, Vetevendosje spokesman Arlind Manjuka acquitted him of the prosecution, Egzon Azemi and Qerim Elshani were sentenced to 6 months in prison for deportation, while Edi Zeneli was sentenced to 6 months in prison for inciting division and failure. The Foundation's decision was made after criminal acts for Azem and Zenelay were updated.

The appellate college of complaints at the Court of Appeals on Monday contained this composition: Ferit Osmani- head of college, Avni Mehmeti-the reference judge and Mentor Hajra-member.

According to Judge Osmani, guests for the session were all the accused, as well as the injured Judge Mentor Bajraktari and former special prosecutor, Africa Shefkiu.

The accused were present: Eddy Zenelaj and Qerim Elshani, meanwhile, lacked Egzon Azemi and Arlind Manjuka, but for the last two present were lawyers Xhema and Berisha. None of the Appeals Prosecutors and the injured were present at the session as well.

Judge Mehmeti said the prosecution has filed complaints regarding Manjuka's liberation act, proposing that the same be found guilty or the case be turned into retrial. For the rest of the accused, meanwhile, he has proposed a harsher punishment.

The Appeals Prosecutor, on the other hand, has proposed to the court that the prosecution's complaint about Manjuka be approved and the same be found guilty, while to the other three indictees the most severe sentence be pronounced.

The response to the Prosecutor's complaint on Manjuka gave lawyer Rosafa Berisha, proposing that Apel refuse the complaint as baseless and confirm the foundation decision.

The complaint about Azem elabored lawyer Teuta Xhema, who claimed that the Constitutional Court on the case of declaring her guilty defense of “Candation” has exceeded the indictment, since Azem was charged with “Hate Decent”.

So, Gemma demanded that her complaint be approved and Azemi be acquitted of the prosecution, or the case be turned into retrial, or if the Court of Appeals confirms the Foundation's decision, then the sentence on Azem be replaced by fine.

On the other hand, lawyer Muharrem Kurtaj for the accused Elshani said that the prosecution itself in final words had proposed the foundation to the softer sentence, and that in the plea of the indictment there is only one estimate that the canno has occurred to senior officials -- judges and prosecutors.

According to Kurtaj, the words used by Elshani entered the domain of comment and freedom of expression, each citizen guaranteed. He said that in case Apel confirms the Foundation's decision, consider easing the sentence, since Elshani is a family keeper.

For the accused, meanwhile, Zenelaj, lawyer Albattri Bytyqi said the foundation decision contains essential violations of the Penal Procedure Code provisions, as the site of criminal work is lacking in the device.

According to Bytyqi, the part of the device's reasoning has contradictions, and this as a result of requalified from the criminal act of “Kanosje” on that of “HNx3>, for the accused Zenlay.

For the tested CD, Bytyqi said it is described and is not known what it contains, adding that the bias has been compiled on the basis of assumptions rather than proven facts.

For the conviction pronounced against the accused, Bytyqi said there is no individualisation of the sentence as Cody requires. He demanded that if the Court of Appeals estimates that there is no violation as a decision, then the prison sentence Zenelaj to '%i is replaced by fine.

Similarly, Bytyqi said that the Constitutional Court has failed to respond to the defence proposal that prison sentences be replaced by fines, and that according to him, the Supreme Party already has a decision that must be answered for those cases. So even in this situation, the foundation decision, according to Bytyqi, is illegal.

Later, Judge Osmani announced the trial to be concluded, announcing that within the legal deadline, the parties will accept Apel's decision.

Otherwise, the Special Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo (PSRK), on November 8, 2023, has filed charges against Arlind Manjuca, Egzon Azemit, Qerim Elshani and Edi Zenelaj, who are charged with carrying out the criminal work “Canosja” and “

According to the indictment provided by “Justice Vow”, Manjuka and Azemi are charged with criminal work “The quality of division and failure to be”, meanwhile Elshani and Zenalaj are charged with “Canning”. The same are being accused of deliberately having deliberately injured the Founding Court judge in Pristina, the Special Department Mentor Bajraktari and special prosecutor Africa Shefkiu.

The indictment says defendants Manjuka and Azemi on December 28th 2022, misusing their official position via social network “Facebook” has deliberately spread and fostered hatred and inadequacy against the injured Bajraktari and Shefkiu, who in the quality of official persons on December 28, 2022, had decided on changing the detention measure against suspects Dejan Pantic.

“defendant Arlind has distributed the post with the words: “This sentence is actual”, then they have continued with other stimulating post “for whom does this court work!?, similar as defendant Egzon posted the scripture with the words: “After the assassination he carried out in Paris, against Esat Pas Toptan, among other things, Avni said”, where this document the suspect has attached a photo to the description: “Lead traitors have taken revenge on””, said in the indictment.

On the other hand, according to the charge, these same actions have taken dangerous, instigating, and lynching actions with the tendency to influence or prevent the function of injury, which has the potential to disrupt public order and damage their own image and integrity.

With this, each separately, they are charged for the criminal act: “The quality of the division and failure to endure” by Article 141, paragraph 2 concerning paragraph 1 of the Republic of Kosovo's Criminal Code.

Meanwhile, according to the indictment of defendants Elshani and Zenelaj, shortly after the posts of the highly described defendants in the manner described as in the first device, promoted by the same, defendants have deliberately injured African Shefkiu and Mentor Bajraktari.

The defendant Qerim commented on the defendant Egzon Azemi's post with the words: "The “he's not the pilot. ”, while the defendant Zenelaj had taken action by placing X-rays on walls with inscription “The push of shame Justice Mentor Bajraktari and Prosecutor Afrem Shefrykiu”, with cases of injury causing anxiety, fear and uncertainty for life, said the indictment.

With this, each alone is being accused of committing article 181 rowing criminal work, paragraph 3 over paragraph 1 of the Penal Code