The trial of failure to meet the contract is required to return to financial expertise treatment once more

At Thursday's session at the Constitutional Court in Pristina in the trial for failing to meet the contract, the representative of the indicted party, lawyer Ibrahim Dobruna, demanded that financial expertise be returned once again to treatment, according to the requirement for calculating lost profit for the rent, starting from July 2007 to drafting expertise.

In this case, N.M., J.M. (and her M children. M, E.M. and E. M) as well as F.M., have indicted “Durent Group” for failing to perform the construction object at the set time under the contract bound between them and B.G., owner of the “Durate Group”.

“ ... necessary assessments to return to the treatment of financial expert Flamur Keqa in demand for calculating lost profit for the rent, starting from July 1st 2007 to the development of expertise”, said Dobruna, the “Bet on Justice”.

On the other hand, the prosecution party's attorney, Musa Damatti, said that as far as expertise in the report is concerned with the plaintiffs, he considers that their demands are basically included, but they reserve the right that after the details of expertise and the plaintiff parties eventually address the Court for any eventual completion.

About expertise, expert Flamur Keqa has also been declared at the session.

“I swear by the completion-expertitised consultations, which has been carried out in accordance with the duties given by Court”, said the Keqa expert.

In the end of the case, the case judge, Shaban Prekalla, announced to the parties that the proposals submitted in this session would be decided by special decision after they are handed over to this pre-requisite court for meeting financial expertise.

Today's session was interrupted to continue after meeting legal conditions.

According to the indictment exercised on August 30th 2007, N. M, S.M. and F.M. have been performing deeds for failing to implement the construction facility at the set time under the contract bound between them and B.G. the owner of the “Durant Group Real Estate Development”.

Through the indictment, it has been requested by B.G. to carry out the building facility as soon as possible and to pay the plaintiffs all financial obligations until the keys of residences and premises are handed over.

The plaintiffs on February 19, 2021, have also made the accuracy of the indictment, being part of the lawsuit party, J.M. They demanded that the indictment be approved as a whole, so that B.G. will be charged because of the failure to meet the contract to pay 300 thousand euros.

Meanwhile, on August 26th, 2021 the Constitutional Court in Pristina has taken a ruling with which changing the indictment in the subjective sense for the prosecution side, so that instead of the plaintiff S. The one who died, as the plaintiff, will be his heir- wife J.M. and M children. M, E.M. and E.M.

However, the indictee G., on October 29, 2021, presented the countersuit, demanding from the court that the prosecution's indictment be rejected or rejected as a whole, demanding that the plaintiff now be recognised lost in the value of 49 thousand and 300 euros and the unmatial damage to the image of the value of 8 thousand and 500 euros. Details about the indictment, you can find: THESE. /Betimy for Justice