The rector who was promoted to the professor by voting for himself aims to degrad Enver Hasani, he writes letters to the senators: Persecution

University of Pristina Rector Arben Hajrullahu, who has been promoted to the degree of regular professor voting for himself, is intent on removing this former head of the Constitutional Court, Enver Hasani, for other reasons. At the Senate's final meeting, where he tried without success to do so, four professors were promoted to reason that as a member of the council, they had voted for themselves. He had done the same. Hasan cites the sector's intentions to prosecute him for personal interests, in a letter he has sent to UP's senators and members of the new Ethics Council.

International Law and Relations Professor Enver Hasani says Pristina University Rector Arben Hajrullahu, to whom he has made criminal speculation, is trying to use the Senate as <x0);organ reactorgan” to follow it and degrad it from regular professor to associate professor.

The former head of the Constitutional Court has sent a letter to the UPI senators, who will gather today.

At the November 27, Senate meeting The UP's made the decision to reject the Ethics Council proposal as out of the legal deadline. As a result, Hasani considers that proposal “is legally closed with the decision of November 27, 2024, and any review of it constitutes criminal offence ) abuse of official office”.

Despite this Senate decision, Hasan writes that the Rector Arben Hajrullahu é says he can no longer be regarded as "rector," because “is not one because of open expression of enmity and pathological hatred” against him in a way that says “arbrate and unacceptable, released from the EC's blueprint file, already rejected by you, my so-called anti-legal disinction and treated as good, as if it were an assessment of the US Supreme Court <3->

Hajrullahu had asked the senators that day to vote for the removal of Hasan academic titles, but had received only three votes. His proposal, Hasani calls “arburr and absurd”, and this proposal, as the professor says, confirms his non-founded “character and motivated by personal interests”.

With this, any dimension of the EC's proposal against me, signed by Ishet Morina, has been closed and considered a legally concluded issue due to exceeded deadlines, As arranged by the Senate with the vote against that proposal November 27, 2024Based on Arben Hajrullahu's very proposal. Consequently, AKP's second point of opinion is without an object for consideration, whether in the Senate or any other instance. Meanwhile, another proposal, completely personal, of Arben Hajrullahu for revocation of my academic titles has not gone to the Senate vote, after receiving only three votes“, Hasan was written to UP's senators.

Adoption of past meetings' processes, “never means changing agendas and decision-makings carried out in the previous collection”, Hasani says. That, he says, is a fundamental legal rule.

Whatever your decisions, under the Law for General Administratoral Process, It constitutes real acts and has the same legal effects as other formal acts signed and sealed by the relevant authorities“.

At the Senate's latest meeting, it is set to form an ad-hoc commission that handles former leaders' advances and the current sector. Under these circumstances, Hasan says Rector Hajrullahu has “conflicted interest” and cannot deal with it.

I announce to you that any mention of my name on the part of Arben Hajrullah, in any quality, constitutes persecution and abuse of official duty. From the moment I warned in writing the civil indictment against him, Arben Has Conflicted Interest And he can't deal with me. How much less to use the Academy Senate as a follow-up organ, with the goal of settling personal numbers, Which he created in his mind in relation to me”, writes the professor.

At the last meeting, when the Senate UP's attracted the degrees to four professors with the reasoning that as a member of the council had voted for themselves, but under the same circumstances it was established in the rank of regular professor, including Rector Hajrullahu.

You know, in my last letter, after the Senate meeting on November 27, 2024, I pointed out the injustice that Arben did to his fellow philosophical faculty, who sent them back only because they had been present during the proposal for their advancement. In the meantime, Arben himself, as I have tried with documents and as he himself stated in the newspaper. COMMHA DitoreHe was not only present but also voted for himself. That's why, I made a criminal complaint against Arben. and I am convinced that he will have difficulty proving his innocence”, Hasani wrote in letter sent to the senators.

For whatever elements of illegality are in his actions, Hasan says “Arbeni or anyone else is free to send him to prosecutor”. But it stresses that “any other approach from him or his direct subordinates constitutes a clear criminal act of abuse of official office”.

This letter, Hasan sent to members of the new Ethics Council, asking them to launch procedures against Ishet Morina for <x0 heavy violation of the Ethics Code and Labour Discipline as university professor”, as the Agency for Prevention of Corruption found in its opinion December 17th 2024.

This serious legal offense, with clean ethical and disciplinary dimensions, cannot be overlooked easily. Therefore, the EC must launch procedures against Ishet Morina within legal terms for violations described in the above opinion”, writes Hasani.

Hasan has been denounced by the dean of the Jury Faculty, Avni Puka, for receiving academic calls illegally, not respecting the length of preliminary calls.

Denoncim had come after Hasan had previously denounced Puka for lying to perform doctors at Rome's La Sapienza University. /Express/