Last year's murder in Podujevo, the late man's wife says the purpose of the accused was to put them out as a family

At Monday's session at the Constitutional Court in Pristina has been heard by the wife of the late V.B., L.S., in the case where Education Syla is being charged in the case of the V.B in “Interex” in Podujevo. L.S., said the accused's purpose was to put them out as a family and that the accused was oriented [...]
Injured in the quality of the witness L.S., he said before the Court that she and her husband and son have been the target of the accused, with the aim of ending them as a family, reports “Justice Vocation”
Because his goal already said it even before they had to get to us”, he said damaged, referring to accused Syla.
L.S., he said he saw the guy who shot in the direction of her husband and that he could identify it, but not at that moment, because he was then a stranger to them.
I think he saved my son, because as seen in the video-incision he was in front of me”, he said damaged.
She has confirmed that as a result of those injuries, she continues to suffer the consequences even today.
And besides, I've had the consequences that I'm suffering today and that I've been having a life-long injury, and besides that, I have very big trauma...”, said damaged, showing that there are still health problems.
L.S., she added that because of her health, she's not working and she's not able to work, and she lives at her parents' house, and that it's her family who take care of food and clothing for her and her son.
In describing what happened, the damaged one said that they went in to buy food in the Internet, and while in the milk sector from behind, they were shot by the accused's son.
She claims that after beating her husband twice, she pulled the other gun out of her bag and struck her husband four more times in the head.
I saw the handman hit him four times with the other gun he pulled out of his bag, in his head”, said damaged.
Asked by prosecutor Duline Hamiti if she has any knowledge of what the motive has led to this case has been linked to a case that happened earlier to the accused.
According to her, she too would like to know why, since her late husband has had no conflict with the defendant, except one case that was present in the incident that now happened to accused Syla with the U.R. (the victim's companion), where accused Syla was injured.
In this case, she said that now the late V.B. has been banned for 48 hours, but she has not been imprisoned or tried for the case, after which the same had been released because she had nothing to do with the case.
Defenders of the accused, lawyer Besnik Berisha has asked the injured about why he would have wanted to deprive the accused of life of the late V.B., having been acquitted of what happened to the accused.
I think that Education didn't have the courage to take revenge directly on the person who committed the act to it, because he has a huge family support that V., he didn't have, and therefore revenge was committed to us to hurt V's friend deeply, because they were very close to themselves”, Sylejmani said.
At today's session, the opening words of the parties in the procedure have also been given, where prosecutor Duline Hamiti has stated that following the investigation of material evidence and witness hearing, the accused will be responsible for the work he is charged with in the indictment.
Meanwhile, lawyer Besnik Berisha has indicated that this trial will prove that accused Syla had no connection with what happened except that he is the parent of the minor, and that, as Berisha puts it, is no crime.
According to him, the prosecution has failed to pass the standard beyond well-based, standard-based suspicion, which he holds has not even increased during the investigation, which he believes will not be fulfilled even during the trial.
Berisha says his defence has taken no action that defines crime in connection with the case in question.
No action that defines crime was undertaken by Education, neither that day nor the day before”, Berisha said among other things.
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina on March 18th 2024 had filed charges against accused Arsim Syla, since the same with the intent of revenge, due to a conflict he had previously experienced during 2022, with the late V.B. and the U.R, the defendant had ordered his minor son L.S. to deprive the deceased of life now.
On the other hand, the accuser reportedly on September 11, 2023, defendant Syla and his minor son L. S, they had gone to the Advantage of the Dead V. B, entering the market with his wife, injured L.S. and their 4-year-old child.
According to defendant Syla's indictment with his L.S. son, they leave the restaurant, where Syla instructs the minor L.S in the direction of the late V. B, who is in pursuit of him while defendant Syla continues to exit the facility and the moment the late V was. B and his wife, L.S., and his child arrive at the milk products sector, the minor L.S., approaches him from behind and first shoots twice in the direction of the late V.B.
The same one shooting at the back and neck, one of the shells goes through the body of the deceased V now. B and shooting at his wife, L.S., who had started to leave at the moment he heard the crack, while the minor L.S. out of the bag had pulled out the other gun that hit the deceased V's head four times more. B, who was already lying on the ground.
As a result of these gunshot shots, the late V. B, dies at the scene while damaged L.S., is sent to the CKUK by the heavy wounds he suffered immediately after the shooting.
However, the minor L.S. had quickly stepped out of an "Interexe" walking in an unknown direction, while defendant Syla was offered to the car of the type Mercedes EXIt, which he parked in front of éInterexão and had gone to his home in the village of Glamnik in Podujevo, where he was also arrested by Kosovo police.
During the raid on his house, he had been found and seized, a pistol and a twin hunting rifle with maintenance permits, 62 pistol bullets, as well as 20 rounds of hunting rifle and 2 bulletproof bullets.
With this defendant, Arsim Syla, in collaboration with minor L. S, had committed a criminal offense “grave murder”.












