40 thousand euros in bail for Isni Kilajt's release

Isni Kilajt's family through his lawyer, Iain Edwards, have proposed to court 40 thousand euros in bail for the release of his family who is being accused of trying to influence witnesses. The lawyer said Kilaj is also ready for new conditions in the event it is thought that court circumstances related [...]
The lawyer said Kilaj is also ready for new conditions in the event it is thought the court's circumstances regarding this part have already changed.
I'm not asking you to believe that you give Mr. I have a chance of an unconditional possibility, but I urge you to establish that it is a good candidate for parole and to establish the same conditions that were imposed by the only judge he has fulfilled. It's open for you to come up with other conditions if you think developments in recent weeks have made a difference. You may order Mr. Kilaj reporting to the police station more than once a week. You may not allow him to travel further than his home in Malisheva. You may decide not to use any means of communication other than to communicate with his lawyer, which is not very practical. I can say I talked to Mr. President's family. Kilaj and they can pay more for bail from 30,000 to 40 thousand euros”, the lawyer said.
The lawyer also said that this money was raised by the large family members of Chilay because they trust him.
It won't be easy for them. Kilaj and his family are not wealthy, but the extended family are willing to contribute, make sacrifices to raise such a large sum because they trust Mr. Kilaj”, the lawyer said.
Edwards also said Kilay has knowledge that in case he does not abide by conditions, he will lose the money.
So, according to him, this fact would not allow Kiline to perform any action that the SPS said is dangerous.
Mr. Kilaj that such a large amount of money would be lost if he hid or found that he had prevented the process, the knowledge of such a loss would serve as a factor not to allow Mr. Kilaj to make one of these” actions, the lawyer said.
The lawyer also said the only judge had ascertained that Kilaj could remain at large even after confirming the indictment on the condition that he would attend any hearing the court would appoint him.
Prior to that, the lawyer said Kilaj has proved to be a safe and good candidate for parole and that this proved true over the past seven months.
Edwrds said that in November last year, the only judge was not convinced to give Kilajt the advantage of the doubt and that Chilaj was not given the chance to prove that he could be trusted on parole. But that was after just six months and it was given the opportunity to prove that he could be trusted.
He said that all the notes in the subject file show that Kilay has fulfilled faithfully and completely whatever conditions are assigned to him.
Although the prosecution says the circumstances have changed, Kilajt's lawyer says that nothing has changed in essence because even at the time he was released on parole, his client knew he would face trial, was aware of the seizures in his house but adhered to conditions set by the court.
What the prosecution wants to accept is absurd, it doesn't make any sense, it's meaningless. This cannot be the only point where you make decisions and remove the freedom of a person who has peacefully lived on parole for the past seven months because it is groundless and is groundless as a brick on the wall that is tearing down”, the lawyer said.
The lawyer also said Kilay had knowledge of the actions taken by the Prosecutor and has also been aware of the allegations and evidence that were seized in his apartment. Although he believes he will not be found guilty, the lawyer said Kilaj knew there would be an indictment on the SPS side and also that he has been able to face a five-year sentence.
Since he has already received the confirmed indictment and has seen the charges, lawyer Edwrds said Kilaj already knows he could be punished less than five years in prison than he originally thought.
However, the prosecutor said there is no point in saying that Kilay knew there would be an indictment against him. He took the last year's detention hearing in example, where his lawyer had said none of the evidence was enough to detain his client.
As a result, prosecutor Joshua Hafetz said there was no way to know Kilaj because in his mind he had done nothing wrong.
The prosecutor said Cilaj was acquitted because of the delay in the process and not because of the confidence offered. He said this situation has already been overcome because the charges against him have been confirmed and are on trial. /Regression/












