Aktakuse against two people in Prizren for serious bodily injury, resulting in death

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren has announced that he has filed charges against indictees E.A., (Turkish states), and H.B. (Kosovo states) that are under the measure of detention, due to the suspicion of having committed criminal acts “The heavy bodily launch”, “the failure to hire” and the criminal work “for the non-adversation of criminal acts or their tops”.

The report described the indictment, where the case occurred.

“Following the indictment, defendant E.A., dated 06.2024, about 23:50 minutes, in Prizren, by dangerous means, causes body injury to the other person and causes his death, in the way they meet with the A.T.T. victim in advance, from Prizren to the town of Curilla, by cerrases the victim asks the defendant to call in order to inform his fellow H.B., after this comes with his last car, the victim sits on the back of the victim, while the victim sits on the front door, and then then the car cuts out of the car are first spoken for him, and then the victim gets pulled out of the car, and the victim's name is sent back to the victim, and the victim is sent back to the victim, and the victim is sent to the target.

With these actions, the E.A. defendant is said to have carried out criminal work “Burial Body Initiative”.

“while, the defendant H.B., with the date 06.07.2024, about 23:55 minutes, in Prizren, does not offer help to the person whose life was in danger directly, even though it could do so without any real danger for himself, in the way that he was carrying the victim A.Th., in his car, knowing that the last one was seriously injured by the defendant E.A., does not send the same to the health care institution, allows the car and leaves it in the vicinity of the neighborhood “, knowing that the latter was seriously injured in the neighborhood, and that theqOXHKHKHCHCHCHCHKWA vehicle, followed, and that's car crash has been dealt with HOXCHOCHKHOWCHOCHCHD, followed.

He is also said to have been aware of the identity of the head of a serious bodily injury criminal, not to have informed the competent body of such a fact, so that after having been aware of how an eyewitness in carrying out a criminal act by E.A., he has nevertheless refused to inform the police or other competent body about the commission of the criminal work and the identity of its chief.

This way, defendant H.B. has committed criminal acts against aiding and not warning of criminal acts or their superiors according to the KPRK. The prosecutor of the case in the case of setting up the indictment has proposed to the court that, after maintaining judicial review, management of their evidence and assessment, the high-ranking defendants for the criminal acts they are accused of being found guilty and sentenced to the law”, the statement said.