Next session scheduled for Hajdari to hit a child by car

News of this session's appointment has confirmed it for “Justice Vow”, representative of the damaged party, lawyer Florim Shefqeti.

According to him, the super-expertosis that was set to take place has been forwarded to all sides.

The super-expert of road communication was scheduled to take place at the session, held on December 8, 2022.

According to the super-expert provided by the “Justice Trust”, which has been compiled on September 5, 2023, the foot is said to have taken action to cross the road with hasty steps, unexpectedly.

On the other hand, this super-expertosis is said to have taken action of crossing the road in front of the parked vehicle (which has reduced the visibility field for management of the vehicle), without providing enough for safety conditions to cross the road.

All in the end, it is found that “vehicle driver “Ford Fiesta” has not shown proper care during the urban traffic movement in areas where the requirements for foot movement and other unincared movements are greater, reacting late in the action action of fast-pression with the aim of the avoidance of”.

Otherwise, at the October 12th 2022 session, Minister Hajdari had said he was not guilty of the accident where a child was hit, according to her, she had been at speed within the communications rules and that suddenly the girl was hit by the car after the same girl had been running.

Otherwise, the request to defendant Hajdari for the initiative of the counter-invention procedure was made by the Kosovo police station, the Kosovo Police Regional Road Communications Unit, for the accident that took place on 10 April 2022, about 12:25 on the “Vicianum”, in Pristina's “Arberia” neighbourhood.

At the same request, Hajdari was tasked with “Speed non-recognition” and “Accur communication with body injury”.

Meanwhile, for “Justice Trust”, the representative of the damaged party, lawyer Florim Shefqeti, had said they appreciated that the communications expert would determine the position of the defendant, which, according to the video, was seen as being on the left side, while its direction of the movement was the right arm.

He said the prosecution had to first define the speed of moving ahead of the case's instructions on counter-insulting.

And also, from the subject paperwork has been the rainfall route and from the speed of movement seen in the video, we expect what was normally required to make the prosecution determine the speed of moving and adapting the speed of movement and weather conditions on the road, and this will define whether we have to do more against it or are dealing with criminal work. Similarly, we think that the prosecutor of the case had to clear up this situation before he could point out the case for the Anti-Avention Department”, said attorney Shefqeti.