Prompts Gerjaliu: The diaspora will be hit most by the Bureau for Confiscating Riches.

In a Facebook post, Gerjaliu has called this an experiment, and he feels that it can have negative consequences on society and the state.

When laws are made with a tendency for party interests, rather than state-functioning consequences can be harmful”, it has written, among other things.

Full Posting:

By the functionisation of the State Bureau for Verification and Confiscating Unjustified Riches will be hit mostly by diaspora

Any experiment with the justice system can have negative consequences on society and the state.

This is especially true when there is no literal dialogue between relevant acts within a state.

When laws are made with a tendency for party interests and not in the function of the state the consequences can be harmful.

The State Bureau for Infeiting and Confiscating Unjustified Riches and its functioning with these forms as presented, and at this time it will be a direct blow to the diaspora and exiles.

The diaspora contribution is incompatible and in this direction the truth must be understood that through banks and financial institutions a large portion is sent to Kosovo, but most of the money from the diaspora comes during their stay in Kosovo, which is three times what is sent in bank forms.

We have a working diaspora working very hard off working overtime and maybe from two jobs just for the purpose of helping and investing in Kosovo.

The largest design investments are in real estate and is part of the money may even have been earned overtime.

All of this that I said above could have negative effects if it is required to declare the origin of money where diaspora can also verify money from the state bodies where they operate and live.