Murati continues attacks on the Special Prosecution, mentions criminal defaming of Kijevo Street - Zahaq

Murati, even in his writing Sunday, has mentioned the criminal speculation he did in the Special Prosecutor in case of expropriations on Kijevo-Zhaq Street.

He has accused the prosecutor, saying he has rejected criminal premonition only because involved in these dalavares have been the old “contact political”.

So all the evidence and facts are thrown into the water, because it was a case where the old register was involved. ”

And you're very easy to shoot. He wrote among other things.

Murati's scripture:

This month there are two years since I've handed over the criminal report to the Special Prosecutor in the case of misusing expropriations for Kijevo-Zahak Street.

I also attached the report to the audit, which, among other things, found that:

The value of the property that was laid out was about 6m euros on the property tax database.

On May 17, 2019, the evaluation board was submitted, and the value of these properties was estimated at 31m euros - about 5-fold more than the value of property tax.

On December 17, 2019, after the October 6th 2019 elections, although the government in the resignation, the PAN government led by Haradinaj, had adopted the decision to final expropriation, but with other evaluation signs, not those introduced on May 17, 2019.

The difference was that out of the 31m euros in the first table, which was only swollen, the value on the table adopted on 17 December was 43m euros. So about 12m euros change in six months.

Furthermore, the increase was not made as a result of any change in the assessment of all parcels, but this blow resulted from doubling the value of parcels with assigned owners.

Like Government fighting corruption, all that was in our hands is what we have done. So random ID. Meeting evidence, handing them over to the prosecutor. We have also cancelled the decision on expropriation in order to protect the budget from potential indictments.

A literal investigation conducted by the prosecution would also reveal the reasons for these increased values and who had ordered them.

But what has the Special Prosecutor done?

You reject the criminal snooze.

It does so with the reasoning that with the government's decision to annul the drilling (the Kurti Government decision), budget damage has been averted. And since there's no budget damage, there's no criminal offense that the prosecution should investigate any further. That was kind of the excuse.

So all the evidence and facts are thrown into the water because it was about a case where the old register was involved.

Who was the prosecutor in charge of this case, I believe it's very easy to shoot him.