The subchairman signed the contract to escape the president's conflict of interest with the economic operator”

These statements were made by witness Buyipaj, at Thursday's session of the quality of the legal official under the Directorate of Geodezia and Cadastre, reports “Justice Trust”.

Initially, witness Buyupaj said he was in charge of various tasks for the development of the public auction for disfigurement of the municipality's properties, including the injured cadastral unit.

He said the law on the provision of exploitation envisions that the right to initiate the procedure for the provision of municipal property is to the mayor as its representative, and that he said he testifies to the mayor's decision, which he presented.

He said he was not legal because he lacked the signing of the mayor, the name of that proposal map and seal.

The chairman's proposal has been proposed in the Municipal Assembly Convention and by majority of votes has been approved by 29.03.18 and with the approval of the chairman's proposal in the municipality's proposal, the winner is not determined only opens the possibility of giving to the exploitation of municipal property through public auction”, witness Buyipaj said.

He then clarified the legal procedures on how confirmations have gone to the Ministry of Management of Local Power, where they were later given positive answers regarding confirmation of legitimacy.

Following that witness ruling, the witness said they have opened the public auction where they had been open for 30 days, where various bids were submitted during that period in closed envelopes.

He said the bidders had been economic operators “Macron”, and “Alen”.

Regarding these two operators, he said they had been operating on the same parce before the public auction was declared, but he had later understood that.

The witness said the owner of the economic operator “Macron” was Gani Rugova.

“After the appointment of the winner “Macron” for the unit that next action is concerned about was the contract link between the municipality as tenant and auction winners as tenants, in this case “Macron”, who was signed by Lulzim Blaj in the name of the Komuniser”, said witness Buypaj.

He said that after this case had taken place, he understood that signing by Lulzimi, who had been deputy mayor of the municipality, was meant to avoid the conflict of interest by the late H.R chairman with his brother, Gani Rugova.

He said the mayor of the municipality has had a legal obligation to state in writing the Anti-corruption Agency for the existence of the conflict of interest.

On the other hand, witness Buyipaj added that accused Lulzim had sent an e-mail authorisation to be regulated by contract numbers, printed and sent to the president for signing and sealing.

That day, he said H. R, had been interviewed by Pristina Police Investigation.

“Then Lulzim called me on the phone and told me to print the authorization, I printed it and sent it to the mayor for signing and sealing, but the chairman personally didn't meet and I gave that printed authorization to President Valmir Lojaj's cabinet chief, who then returned the authorization signed and sealed”, said witness Faton Buyoj.

He said accused Lulzim had told him there was such authorization, but he could not find that moment.

“The moment he described that authorization, I had no idea that by my actions I am incriminating for any criminal work to be committed”, the witness said.

In that authorship sent to the accused Blakaj, he said he had given him the clarification that he must remain officially and on April 18th, 2023.

Such authorization had not existed at all and has therefore demanded that the word be formally decided.

On the other hand, as a witness, witness Qaush Balaj had been heard, but the same had announced to the court that his health condition was too heavy and could not be declared, with his statements given to the prosecutor considered read.

After that, because of the large number of documents divided into three files by the prosecution, prosecutor Valboa Disha-Hagjoya asked that hearings be postponed for another date to list and determine their number of evidence and dates and then managed.

The proposal, which was not rejected by the other parties, was approved by the chairman of the Court Shaqu Curri, and the next session was scheduled for July 26, 2023, at 09:30.

Otherwise, on September 20, 2022, defendants have been declared innocent, against the Peja Prosecutor's Charge, which charges them with criminal acts of corruption. While in this session, prosecutor Valbona Disha-Hashosa has technically improved the judicial definition of the indictment, referring to Article 81 (continual criminal acts) of the 2013 Penal Code, according to the application of the Penal Code at the time of the criminal act, removing <x0 minussen 77 of the new Penal Code”.

According to the indictment filed on February 21st 2021 by the Founding Prosecutor in Pec, defendant Lulzim stands accused that on October 8, 2020 in Istog, in the official document entitled “Autoriism”, had marked false data confirming even with the official stamp, as now the late H.R.R. and defendant Blakaj's understanding of what cases they are investigating, the defendant is looking for legal official, witness Faton Boujupaji to post the official document <x>, the April 18th 18th, and the former mayor, ordering him to have a document aimed at 2018.

By this, he is accused of committing criminal work “Falsification of the official document”, by Article 427, par.1 of the Penal Code.

Indictee Ismet Hasi is accused of continuing to misuse the official task, so that on October 5, 2017, October 24, 2017 and March 23, 2018, in the quality of Sector Leader near the Directorate for Cassasser and Geodezi in the Istog Community with the aim of benefiting the company “MaCon” and owner of Gani Rugova and company “At Allen's KPS”, owner Fadil Dresey, has ruled through which he made the permanent shift of agricultural land from the 3rd-class mountain to infertile land.

All of this, it is said, with the aim of creating the possibility that the company “Man” avoids the obligation to confer favor with the change of temporary forest or forest land on other ground from the Kosovo Forest Agency, as the sole institution in the Republic of Kosovo, competent under the Law on Agricultural Land and Kosovo's Law on exchange of agricultural land

With this, it is accused of continuing to commit criminal work “Using official position or authority”, from Article 422, par.2 related to par.1 related to Article 77, par.1, KPRK's 1.3 points.