Infrastructure ministry illegally stamps Pristina tender APUjevo

Procuring the Ministry has broken the law once again as it signed the contracts. This has been a complaint handed down by a company in the Procuring Organisation.

Public Procure Law, namely, rule no. 0/01/2022 for Public Procurement has clearly specified that the Accounting Authority cannot sign a contract until complaints are considered that an economic operator has handed over to the Procuration Research Organisation.

Unless the corresponding panel submits another written decision and until it makes this decision, the handover of a complaint owes contracting authority automatically to suspend the procurement activity with which it deals with”, says Article 66 in chapter “The pending effect of the complaints”. The ministry, not that it has not suspended its activity, but that the complaint has answered more contract signing.

Periscope has not received answers during today concerning whether the decision to sign contracts is legal without complaints at the OSHP being addressed.

In this regard, Periscope is awaiting an answer from the OSHP.

Total contracts total 34.2m euros.

For tears 0 is recommended The Economic Operator Group: “Pro& Co Group” Spec; “484, 854, 58 euros.

For tears 1, Group Economic Operators “2 A Group” Exp; “Vega” shpk, worth 8, 447, 477.70 euros.

For tears, 2 Economic Operator Group “Buyar Shaban B. I”; “Kosovo Asfalt” shpk '%; “Bagher-1” far; “El-Bau” Shrik, worth 8, 644, 259.75 euros.

For tears 3 Group Economic Operators “Agbes Building” shpk; “Arbotec” Sharp; “Geo Construction” shpk; “Mineral L.L. C”; “MB Group” Short, worth 9, 254, 811. 42 euros.

For tears 5 Group Economic Operators “Beni-Com” Apple; “Saba Belca” -Dega in Kosovo; “Sherif” Exp, worth 1, 443, 784. 50 euros.

This wasn't the only offense he ever committed to the mining.

The contest has been around 25 subjects, mainly companies in the consortium, among which there have been cheaper bids but have been eliminated from the race for various reasons.

As soon as the promoters were announced, several weeks ago, some of the companies have disagreed with the ministry's procurement decision, when it declared them irresponsible, even with the decision to recommend contracts for upper companies. Shortly after the decision, in the 5-day legal term, some of them have applied for reexamination (anke) to the ministry's procurement office.

Based on the Public Procure Law, the ministry has suspended its decision on contract recommendation on June 7th (June) to review complaints.

After spending 24 hours on their own, ( Thursday) has reported to economic operators about the outcome of reevaluating complaints. The complaints have been approved for the subject to go to reassession for tears 2 and 5, while for tears of 0, 1, 3 have been rejected. In this case, the ministry has had to wait 10 days to lift the suspension decision, and make another decision.

This is because economic operators have been eligible for 10 days, following the ministry's ( Thursday), June 8th) decision to file complaints with the Procuratory Organisation. The ministry has not expected this, but has charged the decision to contract for three tears, 0, 1 and 3.

This decision conflicts with the Public Procure Law, namely with secondary legislation “Rule No. 001 -2022 for public procurement”.

Article 61 of this regulation speaks of the steps of procuring and back-to-hand action.

“61.1 Presentation of the request for review automatically suspends the procurement procedure, and in this case the Contractive Authority, respectively, must write down all parties regarding the suspension of the procurement procedure in question.

Whenever the suspension mentioned is linked to the AK's decision on contracting, such suspension will not be completed before the end of a period of at least 10 calendar days from the date of the publication of the AK” decision, the regulation is specifically said.

Meanwhile, as seen by documents in charge of E-Prokurim, the ministry has lifted the suspension after four days.

Days ago, Periscop has reported that in terms of the contract, several Homies of the Ministry of Infrastructure's procurement chief, Nexhat Krasniqi, and Deputy Minister Hysen Dumrish are recommended.

Periscop has also reported that the ministry's procurement has ignored one Public Procurement Regulatory Commission Opinion - KCPP connected to an illegal criteria that he applied to this tender procedure.

Also, from him The findings have proved that the Ministry's procurement has set assessment criteria for contracting that are contrary to the Public Procurement Law../M. B - Periscope.