Bombing killings in Gjakova's Smolica, after five years, will become the reconstruction of the site of the event.

At Monday's session at the Constitutional Court in Gjakova, the nomination of defendant Dod Gjikolaj's defender, lawyer Xhemajl Ademi, has been approved for reconstructing the scene site, in the trial for the explosive murder. Lawyer Ademi's proposal has been approved by the chairman of the court, Judge Ilir Raskaj, reports “Justice Trust”. Gicolaj yes [...]
Lawyer Ademi's proposal has been approved by the chairman of the court, Judge Ilir Raskaj, reports “Justice Trust”.
Gjikolaj is charged that on October 14, 2018, in the village of Smolica in the Gjakova municipality, he has now deprived the deceased H.A. of his life by placing explosive material on the courtpost of the deceased's home, with this case of bodily injury even damaged A.K.
Also, at Monday's session, Judge Raskaj has approved the attorney Ademi's proposal for ensuring evidence of the entrances and exits of the accused Gjikolaj from the border management system of the Republic of Kosovo and the Republic of Albania, for the period of 11 September 2018 to October 31st 2018.
Regarding these proposals, objections have failed to present prosecutor Ervehe Gashi, representative of the injured H. A, lawyer Prek Kola and the F.A. and A.K.
Similarly, attorney Ademi proposed that the person be heard in the quality of the witness. The NNN, which according to him, this person in the July 25th 2019 investigative report, which is located in criminal conviction, has provided information about the actions of accused Gjikolaj.
However, this proposal has been rejected by Judge Raskaj, arguing that the higher report was not proposed as evidence by the prosecution.
On the other hand, the session continued with the reading of the subject paperwork, and video recordings of October 10, 2018 was made at the scene.
The accused Gjikolaj has made remarks as to reading the subject's papers, describing reports in the indictment as contradictory.
According to him, the report on the phone number “Vodone”, which says the accused on September 11, 2018, found that he was south of the Bishop at 11:18 minutes, is contradictory with the border management system report, which results in the same date, at 10:32 minutes, the same border point has passed the Vremica.
In this regard, prosecutor Gashi has said these are two separate issues -- the telephone number movement, which contains the report of Albania's authorities and the movements of accused Gjikolaj from the Kosovo Police Border Management System report, which confirms the indictees' entry into Kosovo.
On the other hand, accused Gjikolaj has denied that the Facebook page “Love the birthplace of pigeons” is his address and that he has never been asked about the matter.
In this regard, the F.A. has reacted and damaged, which statements by accused Gjikolaj have described as untrue.
Later, Judge Raskay has interrupted today's session, while announcing that the trial in this case will continue with the appearance of the event on June 22, 2023.
Otherwise, according to the indictment filed on August 5, 2022, by the Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren, Dod Gjikolaj, is charged with being charged that on October 14, 2018, in the village of Smolica, of the Gjakova municipality, has now deprived the late H.A. of life.
According to the indictment, the Dod Gjikolaj had done it since the critical day, had placed an explosive material on the doorpost of the deceased's home, the moment the deceased man was about 08:02 minutes old, exits the yard doors, just when he tries to close the court doors, the defendant from an unknown distance, through corrections activated the explosive material, where he happens to remain dead in the country, H.A., and body injuries are damaged by AK.
In this case, according to the indictment, he is charged with committing the criminal act of “excessive murder” by Article 179, paragraph 1, 1.5 of the Criminal Code.
The same is being charged with the criminal offence of unauthorized possession of explosives, type, and unknown nature by Article 374, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code.












