“10 000 pages for 10 days”: Jean Mitrev complains of court case against him

The defense panel in the trial against Jean Mitrev was given only 10 days of work to read over 10,000 pages of material and prepare for the court act.

Procedures thus far after the establishment of the indictment against Jean Mitrev leave the impression that on one side are already the prosecution and the court and on the other is the defence.

So in the procedure following the complaint against the ruling to block the accounts of clinical hospital Jean Mitrev's account, following the preamble of the complaint and the submission of the case to the Skopje Appeals Court, the prosecution has handed in additional written evidence that has not been handed over to the defence, and the court's act of appeal for the refusal of the complaint refers to this evidence.

The defence has not even been given the opinion of the Skopje Public Prosecutor, and these are violations the courts cannot know because they are covered by the justice of the High Court of the Republic of Northern Macedonia and the European Court of Human Rights.

And now, in the period between the sessions' postponements, to study the evidence presented by the prosecutor for more than 10,000 written pages and a large number of electronic content, protection remains only 10 days of work (a four-hour-a-day search) on the same time as the preparation of defense, and for that the lawyers have applied in writing for the redirection of the trial, but the Court has provided no answers.

Does all of this mean that the idea is to be condemned by Jean Mitrev after a brief and disrespectful procedure of fundamental protection rights?