The patience for listening to the bribe relative: Why don't you do Florenti at the Ministry?

I've met Florent right away. As much as I had information, so much Florenti. Why didn't he work for me when he was appointed counsellor, not Alpha? I And take responsibility for a worker there.”, says Durmish.

“On a show was presented a recording, I don't know what is correct, it develops in a closed way. I have some issues I want to say. Berat Buzhala has published those wiretaps claiming to have been in investigations, as if the police were unable to investigate. If it was this job at the prosecution and if any evental prosecutor hadn't dared to investigate why he hasn't reported to the KKP. Or at least let it be known who they were who did not dare investigate. ” said Durmish on ATV.

He goes on to say that Minister Lieburn Aliu's adviser is not mentioned at all in wiretapping.

“has no version Florent Ramqaj, since it is not mentioned in wiretapping but they mention it. How this is handled. We're talking about a case where a company official discusses with another official who we don't even know who he is. Based on what we've heard, we're dealing with a corrupting work and we're looking for the prosecution and the courts take steps of”, Durmish adds.

He further adds that the ministry has no contract with Infratek and shows how copyrights are used by companies to make corrupt relatives.

This is the issue that has not been clarified enough. Our ministry has no contract with Infratek. There was contract at the time Paul Lekaj was minister for Dolc-Gjakov Street. When we came to the government that road was in stage of development. It was contracted and it was under development. Here on the basis of the known author, if there are changes in any project (the transmission, archaeological issues, etc). They have a legal obligation to answer whether they agree or not. Here now certain people, or certain interest groups, find these spaces to make different relationships corrupt. What we've heard in surveillance, it's about this. In the name of what they have to make formal consent. I don't know if they really did it. But if so, it is close to corrupting”, he said.

“Me connects me or the minister, to a situation that happens to individuals assigned to private companies, even though they may have some access to any of the minister's advisers. Neither does the minister's adviser have any responsibility for any employees of any company”, he concluded.