International Arbitrazes urges Kosovo institutions not to neglect signed contracts

In this regard, the chairman of the Council of European Investors (KIE), Emrush Ujkan, has said that Kosovo has quarts prepared to represent us in economic arbitration.

Kosovo has good experts, in the field of economy, in the area of what is right economic and representation in arbitration. We have a community of jurists and I know a quadro category that has capabilities and opportunities to represent and protect, so each side is oriented to protect”.

I don't doubt that in this direction. We have evidence that where they were invited or called to give these people their own expertise, so this team of quadried has given the best and performed extremely good”.

So there are Quadros who are educated and developed professionally in most Western countries, so I don't think it's the challenge”.

And attorney Taulant Hodaj has said of Online Economy that Kosovo has no capacity for representation in arbitration, which, according to him, may engage the attorneys' office that specializes in commercial arbitration.

Everyone is informed that there are numerous indictments in arbitration. Normal international agriculture is the specialised institutions that usually deal with commercial disputes, and therefore these would also represent specialised relevant. I think that Kosovo does not have capacities, but it may engage the office of lawyers that are specialised for commercial arbitration in order to protect Kosovo's interests, but before coming to this, it would be good for those institutions that link contracts when they have arbitration clauses or those contracts or agreements that arbitration applies directly to be more careful and professional in response with time and do not neglect because any neglect is in Kosovo dysvorzo and they may lose arbitration to<1> said Hoda.

He has added that the case of loss in arbitration by Post Telekom has come due to neglect by this institution. The Post Telekom case has been more due to the neglect of the Post Telekom institution itself, which has failed to manage the contract and how to approach the problem and secede has done it illegally. If he had good advice from the beginning maybe in the first place he wouldn't have connected that contract, but even if he connected it, he would have solved the way he should. Then his defense was to be desired in arbitration and he lost that case”.