Salihu in the debate over Xhafer Deva: Remembers lack of September of Adem Jashar in Pristina

Analyst and researcher Fitim Salihu writes about the Dhaefer Devin debate that he took a wrong global but favourable local position.

Although this, Saliu says, does not excuse his property orientation.

He took a wrong global position, but favorable local position for the 1941 conditions. The vocal Titos lined up directly globally, but it's three hundred crimes locally. Even though I honestly don't know what kind of antifascist you are if you tolerate or participate in massacres against your fellow citizens. What do I care about your position on the Spanish War, about the invasion of Abisinia, or about the right of the island of Quajaline for self-rule if in Kosovo you were at the top of power when old, young and children were massacred in Tivat, Drenica, Shala, Gnjian, Ferizaj, Push, Skopje, Kumanovo, Tetove and elsewhere?

Full text:

We store it between the capital “Threeesin”, the mention of the invaders two decades after his departure. We have not yet raised a mention of Adam Yasar. In the capital. In the capital, whose dwellings have been built on the bones and blood of thousands of civilians slaughtered after World War II. In the capital was nothing further than Taukbahce, almost downtown, still has the mass cemetery of those days.

Killed by that Yugoslavia, whose monuments we still preserve. Like we're suffering from Stockholm syndrome. Parvjet had begun the fall of Confederates and her generals by antiracist activists in the US.

Many of the Kosovars who liked these actions, when I proposed the fall of “Trade”, as in absurd, I was denied rapt. Many today react against J. Camels. The camel has really cooperated with the Nazis, but it really matters who criticises it and where it criticises it. Only a real anti-fascist critic is legitimate. Not a “Yugoslav anti-fascist”.

You can't be an anti-fascist and clone a regime like Tito's Yugoslavia that killed babies and children, slaughtered thousands of civilians, raped women, raped young people in prisons, denied the use of the flag of an entire nation, and made so many other fascist actions by propaganda for Albanian women as children's mothers (end of Hitler), to close schools in their native language. All of this has happened in 1944-1989 and not only after Milosevich's arrival at the top. It happened during Tito's Yugoslavia.

Hence, J. Devven only criticizes him by the similar anti-fascist prism. It's hypocrisy to criticize J. Devan to praise Tito and the vocal titto under him. And we're talking about J. Camels. Even for his parents.

He took a wrong global position, but favourable local for the 1941 conditions. The vocal Titos lined up directly globally, but it's three hundred crimes locally. Even though I honestly don't know what kind of antifascist you are if you tolerate or participate in massacres against your fellow citizens. What do I care about your position on the Spanish War, about the invasion of Abisinia, or about the right of the island of Quajaline for self-rule if in Kosovo you were at the top of power when old men, young and children were massacred in Tivar, Drenice, Shala, Peje, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Prescheve, Skopje, Kumanovo, Tetoves and everywhere?!