Former head of Gazmend Mujarır cabinet sentenced to prison

Muhajer's former cabinet chief was convicted of misusing office or official authority.

The same six-month prison sentence has been replaced by 70,000 euros in fines.

“The defendant Durim Sheremet, with the date 19,09.2017, as an official person, in the position of the head of the cabinet of the Speaker of the Municipal Assembly in Pec, deliberately exceeds its competencies, in the way that has signed the report on accepting goods titled “Bler's car for the maintenance of the artificial bar for the Paje” Centre, worth 11.929.41, following the mandate and competence of the project manager, who has been the chief of KKC's decision, as the chief manager of the project in charge of the project, or decision. KC. While it has been known that the vehicle that was brought by the economic operator is not according to the demand project, according to the parameters and specifications specified in the tender, as in money, because the vehicle brought by the economic operator is worth 2,000, as well as in the accounts and specifications of the tender, and has damaged the Komun budget for many of the 9.921, while enabling economic operator to benefit here simultaneously. K, benefits in many of the 9,929.41 $”, the Court reports.

By these actions, defendant D. The US has committed a criminal offence to misuse of official position or authority by Article 422 par.1 of KPRK.

Defendant G. L, R.Z.h and G. S., dated 19,09.2017, as official people near the Municipal Assembly in Pec, and in the capacity of the Commission's admission of goods, they deliberately fail to fulfill their official duties, in the way that by the 1909.2017s, even though they did not have a written decision that they are appointed as a member of the commission, they have signed the report on acceptance of items entitled “the car for the maintenance of the grass for the sports Centre in Pajpeci1, at 11.9, without even checking the goods, and meeting the technical terms which are the pre-propossessessessumment of the project, the pre-compossumptionsumption of the project (KOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHOCHODS), they have been pre-KSIFOCHOCHOCHOCHOD, or PEOCHOCHOCHOCHOD, they have been written K Pee, it's been damaged in the amount of $9,929.41, while the economic operator has received a total of 9.929.41.

With which each and every one of them committed criminal acts abuse of official position or authority by Article 422 pm. One of KPRK.

Defendant I. K, as the owner of the firm G. CH. R.C., through false presentation of facts and with the aim of illegal profiting wealth for itself, has caused K harm. K Pay, worth 9.929.41, so after winning the tender by K. K Peja, titled contract “Bler's license to maintain the artificial bar for the Sports Centre at Peja”, worth 11.929.41, the defendant does not adhere to the terms of the tender, where the contractor's contracting authority is presupposed that the location of the car's origin will be Turkey and the production firm U F, as well as specifics designated for the car from 1 to 5th point where the vehicle's total characteristics are specified, so the defendant has not signed by the F firm, but the firm A and the country's firm, Turkey, but the country's location, or Slovenia's location, which has brought the damage to the vehicle's purchases purchase, and KKKKKS purchases purchases purchase has been paid for sale. A lot of $9929.41.

The defendant I.K. has committed criminal acts of fraud by Article 335 par.3. About par.1. KPRK.

Defendants D. The S.H., the court pronounced him a prison sentence during six months, and I will serve him after the court becomes all-powerful.

Conform Article 47 of the KPRK, the defendants, with his consent, were sentenced to prison with fines of many seven thousand, and which penalty is fined, the defendant is obliged to pay him in three months' term (3) months after the sentence becomes powerful, and if he does not pay the penalty by a fine in the appointed term, the penalty will be courted by a prison sentence in which one day he will be counted in many of (200).

The same was pronounced the additional sentence against the ban on the exercise of office in public administration or public service in length of two (2) years after the punishment.

The defendant was obliged on behalf of the criminal procedure's spending, the court will pay the amount of a hundred (100) $100 ($100) in the name of the judicial patriarch's expenses, the amount of $50 (50) and the tax on compensation for the crime victims of 50 (50) - all in the 15 days after the conviction becomes dominant.

Defendants G. L, R. ZH and G. U.S., the court alone pronounced the sentence on bail so that I sentence the prison sentence to six months long, and that the prison sentence, the defendants will not suffer if they can't do any other criminal work in the term of (1) year.

While the state prosecutor's proposal, that the defendants individually be pronounced a supplementary sentence, the ban on exercising office in public administration, or on public service, was refused because the defendants were given parole sentences.

The defendants individually were charged with paying in the name of criminal procedure spending, the court paid the sum of a hundred (100) , in the name of the expenses of the judicial pause, the amount of fifty (50) and in the name of the tax on compensation to victims of crime of 50 (50) , all of these in 15 days after the act becomes all-powerful.

Defendant I. K, the court pronounced him a prison sentence so that I sentence him to prison for six months long, and I will punish him after the sentence becomes powerful.

Convention Article 47 of KPRK, court defendant I. K, with his consent, replaces him with a fine of five thousand, with a fined fine, the defendant is obliged to pay him in three (3) months after the sentence becomes overwhelming, and if he does not pay the fine at the appointed time, the penalty will be fined by a prison sentence, in which one day the prison will be counted in many of the twenty-dollar terms, as well as the penalty that he will impose on him with a lot of fines in two hundred thousand, which punishment is binding on him in three months, after the execution of the period of the months, which he will not be able to pay the penalty to pay 20 days in prison, which he will not be given a 20 days in prison, which he will not be repaid 20 days in prison.

The fine penalty, replaced by many of the 5,000 (U.S.) as well as the penalty of fines in many of the two thousand (2000) is equal to the total amount of $7,000, the defendant is obliged to pay it in the three-month term, after the sentence becomes powerful, and if he does not pay the penalty by the appointed term, the penalty is replaced by a prison sentence, where one day the prison will be accounted for by more than 20-200.)

The defendant was charged that on behalf of the criminal procedure's spending, the court would pay the amount of a hundred (100) $100 ($100) in the name of expenses of the judicial pansalon, the amount of fifty (50) and the tax on compensation for the crime victims of 50 (50) , all of these in the 15-day term after the conviction becomes absolute.

To implement the property requirement, the damaged side is directed at regular civil law dispute.

Against this disgruntled party Act has the right to complaint at the Court of Appeals.