Kadri Wessel's lawyer complains about how the prosecution is serving their materials

Ben Emmerson, the Special Secretary of Kadri Wessel, has complained to the Prosecution about the way the case is treated and the approach that is not being provided to you on relevant defense material, transmits Periscopi. The chaotic and unprecedented way of presenting material. The method of choice material is the most inappropriate way to amplify and [...]
The chaotic and unprecedented way of presenting material.
The way we choose materials is the most inappropriate way to cancel and rebuild what the prosecution is saying and start our investigations. I don't want there to be some kind of misunderstanding about this extra-scaling obstacle we've been made by the way the Prosecution is working, he said.
Not uncompetent and deliberate. And it can predict what the prosecution did. Why do we need to build a prosecutor's order from a amount of material that they didn't make any difference when they gave it to us? This greatly interferes with our work and will interfere with the start of the trial. Organized materials, with some notes and evidence. As a defense, we don't have any preliminary records of the prosecution and he refused to give us the preliminary file and he'll only give us the last moments before trial.
What they're doing with us is they've downloaded the materials, edited and buried the relevant evidence on a bunch of evidence and other materials that may be unrelevant. To do the job properly, we must have the act. We have to look at whole material to pretend what the Prosecution is looking for, he adds. PERISCOP/












