10 minutes agoSignal tender / expected O Steps to Procure Chief and Ministry Open
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)For the past three years, hundreds of miles of national roads are without signaling. Due to this was tender for “Signaling and maintaining equipment on the national and regional roads of Kosovo”, with which <x2 game>” is being done by the Ministry of Infrastructure. Three days ago, for the ninth time, the Ministry of Infrastructure has ruled [...]
For the past three years, hundreds of miles of national roads are without signaling. Due to this was tender for “Signaling and maintaining equipment on the national and regional roads of Kosovo”, with which <x2 game>” is being done by the Ministry of Infrastructure.
Three days ago, for the ninth time, the Ministry of Infrastructure has ruled on this procurement procedure, namely, for tears 2 and 3, after the contract for maintenance of other parts has been signed since 2018, writes the news. The tender was opened in 2017.
After the eighth ruling, issued in May by the Procuratory Organisation for the tender to be converted to re-evaluation, after four months, on August 31st MI issued a decision announcing all irresponsible bids. MI made an announcement to cancel the procurement procedure. This decision conflicts with O's recent decision The KPS, after the “tenders court” had ordered the ministry to announce a double winner to the criteria set in the tender file.
O The Saturday in May of this year had made a decision, where it wrote that “is the last warning of AK to honour its decisions” citing the law saying it would take measures against the procurement manager for revocation of the license and to the ministry would issue a fine no less than 5,000 euros.
O The EMS had made this firm decision after making two similar preliminary decisions, ordering the AK not to cancel the tender. The ministry prior to that decision, on three other times, had ruled on a comprehensive annulment of the process, considering that some mistakes have been made in the tender file and that the tender file has not been corrected since 2017. The wonder of this decision was that the ministry, with those mistakes in the tender file, had signed contracts for six other parts. On three o'clock The KPS found that this was contrary to the LPP and the demand of the tender file, so it ordered the AK to turn the subject into re-evaluation. On two more times, in 2018, the ministry had managed to announce the winners for tears 2 and 3, but after complaints in O The EMS, this body found that the winners were declared irresponsible companies. Another time, the ministry had made the same decision as the latter, considering that there are no responsible bidders, and that the tender for tears 2 and 3.
The news. We have asked O officials The EPS whether to impose fines on the ministry and whether to take measures against the procurement manager, as they said in the last decision, whether the ministry does not abide by O's decision The EPS, to take action, but this institution has said it is waiting once to have complaints against the AK.
“If economic operators file complaints on O The EMS, then the review panel after examining the subject, finds whether O's decision is respected The KPS from AK” says in response to O The news report.net.
The news has contacted two companies who complained again. Company representatives said AK has not respected O decision The EPS will again complain about this decision. They demanded that the prosecution intervene in this case, as they say, the ministry in the past two years has issued several controversial decisions for this tender.
May 29, 2020 The EPS had approved the complaint of companies “RSM COMPANY”, “Dorearti”, “Beni Com”, “Land Markings”, “Snidil RKS” & “IDK Construction” & “2T”, “ITK”, “Select Prima” So, O panel The EP had ordered MI to turn the tender into re-evaluation after arguing that the announcement to annul this process had been contrary to the law. The contracting panel of evidence and evidence given by the parties in the procedure finds that the annulment of procurement activity in this phase represents violations of Article 1, 6, 59 and 62 of the LPP, and Article 44 of RRUPP, as well as disrespect of O'O'S preliminary decisions. The frequency for the activity in question. So the review panel found that the bidding assessment should be done just as the AK did when recommending contract giving. So the assessment should be done based on what the AK has recommended for contract giving. This is about the fact that AK has this procurement activity divided into eight tears, how has it been possible for 6 K tears to have made the assessment and recommendation of the contract, as well as no remarks to implement six contracts, and for two tears it is impossible? The review panel finds that the annulment of this activity is groundless for the fact that the annulment of the procurement activity following the recommendation for contracting and after the return of the procurement activity to re-evaluation, cannot be reasoned as the AK has given it in standard letter for eliminated tenders and the announcement of annulment. This is due to the fact that this reason for annulment would only be considered legal if it had happened before the opening of the bids, not initially recommended to the economic operator for contract, to sign contracts with several economic operators for certain tears, to make decision and ordinance from O The EMS, and finally with no legal basis, the procurement activity is cancelled.
Starting with the findings, the review panel had come to the conclusion that the annulment of the procurement activity in question was made contrary to the LPP's Article 62 and Article 77 of RRUPP and that the examination, assessment and comparison of tenders has not become a concerted article 59 of LPP. Therefore, the contracting authority is imposed that, while reevaluating the bids and in the future, be contained in detail in all the provisions of the LPP and the assessment of the offers, make it according to the terms he originally made when he recommended to contract OE for the handling of the procurement activity in question, and in accordance with the LPP. The AK is obliged to recommend giving the contract only to those responsible economic operators.
The panel explains that the reason for failing to make a decision as envisioned by LPP Article 131 for the procurement activity in question, on the part of O The EPS is the protection of economic operators and does not hurt them based on the fact that AK has found no reason for eliminating them as economic operators who do not meet the demand of the tender file and contract announcement (so the AK has not cancelled procurement activity based on the fact that none of the OE participating procurement activity is responsible). So the panel review allows contracting authority to improve violations made by them for disrespecting the LPP provisions and decisions made by O The EPS, in order for participating economic operators not to be harmed by procurement activity in question, is the last time O The EPS suggests to the contracting authority that disrespecting this decision forces the review panel to work in accordance with the LPP Article 131 and 25 paragraphs 8 and 9 of LPP.
Consequences
The entire tender, with all tears, amounts to about 2.2m euros per year. Until the rest of the tender had been achieved successfully by the Ministry. By 06.04.2018, MlT's Procurement Office had declared the winner of two tears for the company “Select Prima”, for tears 2, tears 3.
Then there's been a constant complaint on O Open for tears 2 and 3. The OSHP had decided that the tenders would return to re-evaluation, as it had approved complaints from complaining companies, thus conspiring to violations of the law. The ministry had implemented that decision in 2006. 2018, for tears 2 again had declared it victorious “Sect Prima”, while in tears 3, the group of economic operators: “Arbotec” S.P.K.; N.P.G. “Malsija”. Again there were complaints on O Posts by complaining companies with the same allegations of violations of the law and therefore the ministry has been unable to sign the contract, as the subject has ended in O The E.P. This body has ruled out the same violations and has issued a warrant to enforce its decision. The ministry has cancelled its announcement and maintained the tender for four months for tears of 2 and 3. On the date 24.08. 2018, he made an announcement on contract relations after reevaluating the tender, and again he had declared “Select prima” winning for tear 2 and for 3 tears the group of economic operators “Arbotec” S.P.K.; N.P.G. “Malsija”
There have again been complaints by companies about the same offense. And again O The E.P. has made the same decision, so that the matter can turn into re-evaluation and not be repaid by contract to those companies for tears 2 and 3, since they were irresponsible.
Early in April, the Ministry has issued announcements of the procurement activity for tear 2 and tears 3, arguing that there is no responsible offer, even though it had sometimes declared the winners to be responsible. Now, the Ministry has used the same reasoning as in the complaining companies when it eliminated the company “Select Prima” for tear 2 and “Arbotec” & “Malsija” from the race.
None of the companies agreed to cancel the tender and again complained to O The E.P. On June 19, O The EP has approved the company's complaints and ordered the Contractive Authority to cancel the announcement to annul this procurement and property activity to become re-evaluating, against earlier decisions on O The KPS, as it considered that conditions have not been created to cancel the entire process, has considered there is legal basis for moving forward.
The ministry decided to implement this decision to allow it to reassess. He held the tender back several months. Initially, it called for extensions of the bids as a legal category. On the 15th. 11. 2019, MlT's procurement office came out with the announcement of contract delivery, where it declared companies “Sinjal the winner. RKS”, which is in consortium with companies from Albania “IDK control & 2T”.
Sometimes irresponsible, then responsible company
In all other reviews for this tender for tears 2 and tears 3, the ministry's commission had declared the company's bid “Signal RKS” irresponsible.
For example, in the decision of the date 08.04. 2019, when he had announced this offer as irresponsible, he wrote that he rejected their offer after that “in the tender file on the Article 13.1 data sheet was requested, securing the tender according to the regulator and Operational Guides Article 39. Explaining the Tents. If the tender insurance doesn't contain the conditions defined according to standard form, the part of the Tent File does not reject the tender without asking for further information. ”
Even in the 16th decision. 07. 2019, the ministry had again assessed all offers as irresponsible. Unlike the last time, he had later given a much stronger reason when he canceled the “Sinal RKS” bid. The ministry's commission had estimated that this company has offered manipulative prices, in part 2 position 1.1, has offered the price of 0.80 euros, 1.2 has offered the price of 0.80 euros, and part 3, position 1.1 has offered 1.10 euros, 1.2 has offered the price of 1.10 euros, as well as in the 2nd in position 1.4 has offered the price of 0.15 euros, etc.
Long ago the news.net had requested information from MlT about the assessment commission's various decisions, as well as access to the parameters of the company's bid recommended for tear 2 and tear 3, but MlT's information office said that this information could let you know when the process ends.
“Linked to your request for access to public documents, accepted on November 18, 2019, we inform you as follows: This process is in procurement and, at the moment of completion of procurement procedures, we will inform you about access to requested” documents, said MlT's response to news.net.
Before two recent decisions for canceling the procurement procedure, that is, the decision when the company “Sinjal was recommended for contract. RKS”, reportedly, has been the cheaper responsible offer than that of two other responsible companies “Sinyal Papemburg Ardiani” and “RSM Company”, while companies like “Select Prima”, “Doreart”, “Autobotec Malsija”, “ITK” and so on, eliminated as irresponsible.
Even so, news has managed to see the company's parameters “Sinjal RKS” for tear 2, and this company is more expensive than company bid “RSM Company”, which in the recent decision has been declared responsible but more expensive, while this company in all estimates was declared irresponsible.
According to Paramas “Signal” for tear 2, has a total offering worth 321 thousand euros, which for three years has a total of 963 thousand euros. For tears 3 has an offer worth 431 thousand euros, which in three years amounts to 1 million and 293 thousand euros, or over 2.2m euros for three years of two offers.
According to other parameters that have seen the news.net, for tears 2, company “RSM” has had an offer worth 227 thousand euros, for three years 618 thousand euros, or 345 thousand euros cheaper than the signal offer. For tears 3, “RSM) has an offer worth 257 thousand 199 euros, for three years 771 thousand and 597 euros, or 520 thousand euros cheaper than the signal. So the budget the ministry would misuse would be 865 000 euros, because that's the amount of “RSM Company” that for three years cheaper than signaling in both bids.
Although it has been declared irresponsible in the commission's recent decision, even “Select Prima” has had the cheaper offer for tear 2, worth 253 thousand euros per year. 759 euros for three years. For tears 3 has an offer of 148 thousand 662 euros, or 446 thousand euros for three years. This company was declared a winner twice by MlT, and news.net had reported on the proximity of an MlT official to this company, but was later declared irresponsible in MlT's decisions. Even so, this company is working in some parts of Kosovo, as it had managed to win tears 8.
And the other company that's working in two tears, the company “ITK” has had the freest offer for tears of 2, or 183 thousand euros per year, for three years 549 thousand euros. For tears 3 has a total offer for one year 188 thousand 530 euros, which totals 565 thousand euros for three years. Both bids total 1.1m euros, or over 1m euros cheaper than the companies recommended for the contract. But this company has been declared irresponsible because, as it has been said, insufficient numbers of workers.
After that decision or correct to three decisions, MI had cancelled the entire process, saying that the tender file had not been corrected since 2017. The OSHP ordered the subject to turn into re-evaluation and announce a responsible winner, MI turned the tender into re-evaluating, leaving its decision to abort until last time O. The EP found that “the reason not to make a decision as envisioned by the LPP's Article 131 for the procurement activity in question, on the part of O The EPS is the protection of economic operators and does not harm them based on the fact that AK has found no reason for eliminating them as economic operators who do not meet the demand of the tender file and contract reporting (so the AK has not cancelled procurement activity based on the fact that none of the OE participants are responsible for the procurement activity). So the panel review allows contracting authority to improve violations made by them for disrespecting the LPP provisions and decisions made by O The EPS, in order for participating economic operators not to be harmed by procurement activity in question, is the last time O The EPS suggests to the contracting authority that disrespecting this decision forces the review panel to work in accordance with the LPP's Article 131 and 25 paragraphs 8 and 9 of LPP”.
While the AK in the August 31st decision said none of the companies are responsible. On the basis of that decision, he made a KRPP announcement to cancel this tender activity.
That two years 700 kilometers of national roads are off signal.
Signaling the streets for tears 2 is designed to cover these streets:
M.9. 157.00 km
Bellopoj Istog vrelle R ell 103 ....22.00 km
They're coming. 4,500 km
Scenderj ly Cline couser... 4400 km
Check out the R-106 Tower. 1,650 km.
Arlls íhovec Xerxe R -110... 38. One hundred kilometers.
According to the third part of the tender, these roads are envisioned for signal maintenance:
M-9 Doll Ponoshec... 5,500 km
R- 107 Payne... 7700 km
R-109 dDecan Junik Ponosec... 1800 km
R-111 Kramavik Xerxe... 2,700 miles.
R-119 Kijevo Mountain Shive... 28. 100 miles
R-120 Leban away 5,500 km
R121 Raushiq Glodjan Zajm 27. 30 km
R-129 Mitrovica Beygora... 3,600 km.
R-220 Mitrovica Prince Shkabai... 32. 50 km
These parts are being needed for these positions: 1 pull the middle line off, 2. Draw the constant line, 3. Pulling border lines, 4. The work of stop lines, 5. Posting line lines, 6. Islanding and Crossing, 7. Working arrows and inscriptions.
