Enver Hasani Becomes Cause Not to Be Sent for Vote in Public Lawyer Candidates' Session

Days ago, Periscop has reported that the relevant Commission is failing to make the quorum and send three names candidates for ombudsman, to the The polls, due to efforts to restore candidate Enver Hasani to the race.

The Commission for Human Rights, Gender Equality, for Ungenerated Persons and Petitions has failed today to submit the narrow list of ombudsman candidates to the voting session. That was because there was no quorum at the moment of voting due to the departure of two commission members from LVV ranks.

The reason for this became candidate Enver Hasani, who according to points turns to be fourth in a row. And because candidate Edona Hajrullahu as the first and Naim Celaj as the second of the same points were asked to send four candidates, not three as envisioned, to the session.

After being told by the commission chairman, Duda Balje that the Parliament's regulation allows even if two candidates have equal points, regardless of which position they are, four candidates should be sent.

But commission member of LVV Salih Zyba and AAK's Teuta Haxhiu voiced themselves. These refused to vote without a legal interpretation of why three members are not being sent, as the law envisions, but four.

Meanwhile, Commission Chairman Balje insisted that the final list report is in order even after consultations with Parliament Speaker Vjosa Osmani.

The report is legally clean with the entire legal office... 3:21. I'm sure we haven't touched anything and it's all legal. Even with the chief and chief, they asked me to sit down again because there was no clarity where we were and what we didn't understand. Here the work is very clear, since we also have regulation”, she said.

But that was rejected by LVV deputy Salih Zyba, who sought official legal interpretation rather than consultation.

My request was not to allow interpretation, but to seek official interpretation. Now please, which is that performance and whose performance it is. It's not enough to say I consulted the mayor or anyone else. The console is something different, and the interpretation for the article is something else”, he said.

Similar criticism for the procedure also showed AAK MP Teuta Haxhiu, who said she is trying to become an unintelligible campaign for the list of ombudsman candidates.

The “has become a completely unintelligible camouflage. First of all candidates who are in order, I don't take the liberty of who was better now, or not. This ranking that has occurred has occurred from one panel, representatives of political subjects. The candidates we have ahead of us that are equal in point are candidate one, two. Whoever is first or second administration or whoever has done it has committed violations. You don't dare one, two, three, and an extra candidate on the right. Order it like this, I don't know who did it... The candidates must be ranked first, second, third candidate according to scores. According to the regulation we send three candidates to the hearing. Once again, we have had cases, in the regulation, three candidates go very well to the session, except if the two candidates have equal points. But please, the first two candidates have equal points, the third one stops it. If it were the third and fourth candidate, we had the chance to pass the session to four candidates”, she said.

Supporting this list of candidates for ombudsmans gave MPs from the LDK and the PDK.

Last week, too, it has failed to go to the voting session the narrow list of ombudsman candidates.