5 minutes agoDemocracy at risk: Albin Kurti rejects Constitutional Court ruling
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)The incumbent Prime Minister, Albin Kurti, has decided not to accept the Constitutional Court's decision, thus opening up the possibility of unrest in the country. He has argued such an act by saying the decision is unfair and goes in favour of President Hashim Thaci, writes Periscopi. He has further offended in [...]
He has argued such an act by saying the decision is unfair and goes in favour of President Hashim Thaci, writes Periscopi.
He has further slighted the Constitutional Court in a low and unacceptable way, claiming that this court has depreciated itself.
That makes democracy in the country a serious test.
Full Posting:
Last night, in the late hours, we received an announcement from the Constitutional Court regarding the Act on the President's unconstitutional decree.
Let's say from the beginning, that in text and subtex, there's not much on constitutional issues as with the unprecedented method of expressing disciplinary-disciplinary slogans.
Few or no cases can be found in the democratic world when the winner of elections and the government in office itself are ready for new elections, and this is impossible by the Constitutional Court and the president by being called to the Islamic majority in the Parliament and by turning down objective statements and causes such as the serious state of pandemic.
Instead of interpreting the Constitution, the Court seems to have this approach: since the president is right, let's try to reason.
The court has stressed that in 2010 and 2017, following successful no-confidence motions, there has been no will nor a majority in the Assembly to form a new Government, but how they have ascertained this is not known, since the distribution of the Assembly has been automatic.
It is true that the president has an absolute right to distribute the Parliament, but, for this very reason, it is limited to the no-confidence motion as a criterion.
The court has written the announcement in such a way as saying that the winner of the election does not exist at all, as if the winner is inexisten. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Court clears the difference between the dismissal and the executive resignation.
The court prejudges when it says the winner has not only proposed a candidate, but has not expressed interest in such a thing. This does not stand, because it is constantly stressed by us that the winner of the election is not hesitant or refusing.
In some cases the Court has been written down on rewrite of the Constitution, for example. points 13 and 18.
Formation of “type... The court stresses that it is self-continual, that this “consulsive” formal, should be completed as soon as possible and included in itself the demand for fast dynamic interaction”, or, “the right to propose the prime minister's mandate is both a responsibility and a privilege” constitute examples of the creativity of the Constitutional Court judges in expressing their admiration for the country's president's decisions.
A thorough and detailed assessment by our legal advisers will be possible after we receive the complete text of Action.
Unfortunately, the Constitutional Court was lined up with state-captives. She spoke of herself more and more than her case. She sealed herself, she depreciated herself.
Our battle continues, along with the conscious people, against this corrupt caste.
Finally, we have not really had high expectations for the Constitutional Court's decision, but this decision is beyond imagination and under any level. As an unjust person, he is unacceptable. For the next political steps, we will inform citizens in the coming days.
