Regon Melza Haradinaj- Stublla: That's the truth about my case.

That it has been nominated for the minister has confirmed the AAK head, Ramush Haradinaj, after meeting and signing the coalition with the Democratic League of Kosovo.

After Haradinaj has made public the name Meilza Haradainaj- Stubula, the media has brought to the attention the latter's condemnation by the Court for failing to declare the business he had in London.

And seeing that, through a media communique, Haradinaj's adviser has given her version of the drive. She says the business in London had opened in 2015 with an initial capital of 10 pounds.

She explains that the moment she started working as adviser to Prime Minister Haradinaj had consulted an English lawyer and had thus placed her business status on extinction by not performing any financial activities.

Melise Haradinaj-Stubla points out that even this has been the reason why he has not decoupled it as a business in 2017.

I opened a business in the United Kingdom in 2015 through electronic form, respecting all English legislation in power, with initial capital of 10 pounds. In 2017, when I was appointed an adviser to the prime minister, I consulted with the English lawyer, who advised me that business is treated as a sleeper, without a business of business, and as a result, I did not declare it in October 2017 on the prime minister's office. It is noteworthy that business throughout its entire financial history has not exceeded 3,000m circulation. Cite the lawyer's letter even deposited at the Prosecutor: “I can confirm that company ) In Middle Ltd away was not a commercial company on September 30th 2017 and that its status has not changed since then. I can also confirm that the last micro accounts for the company for the year ending on September 30th 2017 showed net asset value of less than 3,000 euros, which is within the threshold set by Kosovo Law No. 04/L-50 (and changing/fulfilling Law No.”, in response.

However, she admits that she has been convicted and that such a decision has sent her to Appeal.

The first-degree decision I've been declared guilty of not declaring unfinished business has been taken on the basis of misinterpreting the company's status and without confirmation by English authorities whether the company has disappeared or not. I appealed this decision to”, she concluded, saying this is the truth of her case.